Page 7 of 18 FirstFirst ... 5678917 ... LastLast
Results 61 to 70 of 180

Thread: More Radeon Power Management Improvements

  1. #61
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    2,177

    Default

    I am pretty sure Linux 2.6.35rc4 has the latest PM functions integrated.

  2. #62
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    2,404

    Default

    The code is already included in 2.6.35. See this post for more information on using it:
    http://lists.freedesktop.org/archive...ay/000492.html
    Note that there is also now a "mid" profile.

  3. #63
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    1,811

    Default

    If I wanted low profile to be used by default on boot, what would be the preferred location to set it?

  4. #64
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Linuxland
    Posts
    5,340

    Default

    Beyond the flicker, is there any downside to frequent reclocking? Shortened hw life?

  5. #65
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by agd5f View Post
    The code is already included in 2.6.35. See this post for more information on using it:
    http://lists.freedesktop.org/archive...ay/000492.html
    Note that there is also now a "mid" profile.
    Oh, thank you. This key information hasn't spread far enough, AFAICS.

    FYI, some power consumptions tests (KMS, Xorg with radeon driver from yesterdays git snapshot, one head enabled, no relevant CPU load):

    default: ~144W
    auto: 127..132W
    high: 137..141W
    mid: 128..131W
    low: 100..103W (pretty close to normal idle state with fglrx)
    low (with both heads enabled): 118..121W (also close to fglrx w/ multihead)

    My naive conclusion is that "auto" mode is not aggressive enough or doesn't get enough information to control efficiently. But I am sure you know better.

  6. #66
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,024

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by curaga View Post
    Beyond the flicker, is there any downside to frequent reclocking? Shortened hw life?
    You should hope not, your CPU is doing it constantly too. As are most of your mobile electronics and such.

    If you're thinking of the HDD lifetime issues with the power management in some Linux configurations that come up a few years back, remember that those things have complex moving parts, and it was the strain on those which led to their decreased lifetime, not the electronics.

  7. #67
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    3,801

    Default

    Power management makes the hardware live longer, not shorter. HW life is shortened when you don't use PM.

  8. #68
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Toronto-ish
    Posts
    7,579

    Default

    Yep. The power management code only programs non-permanent registers - there's no writing to non-volatile memory or anything that would detract from lifetime. The proprietary drivers also dynamically reclock the chips.

  9. #69
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Linuxland
    Posts
    5,340

    Default

    You should hope not, your CPU is doing it constantly too.
    No it doesn't, my desktop board BIOS doesn't support that
    No speedstep or C states beyond C1.

  10. #70
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Italy
    Posts
    1,003

    Default

    Does 2.6.35-rc4 support undervolting? Can it show gpu temperature?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •