Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 21

Thread: Did Ubuntu 10.04 Achieve Its Ten Second Boot Goal?

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    27

    Default

    I updated from 9.10 on my gma4500mhd powered laptop, yet I see no plymouth, in fact the whole boot process looks like a mess with debug/error(though harmless) messages. What's plymouth supposed to look like on ubuntu with KMS?

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Poland
    Posts
    197

    Default

    10.4 boots slower than 9.10 :/ now its 20s before I had like ~12s.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Poland
    Posts
    215

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tares View Post
    10.4 boots slower than 9.10 :/ now its 20s before I had like ~12s.
    That looks like side effect of the upgrade from 9.10 to 10.04.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Ontario
    Posts
    144

    Default

    While it's good you have the full bootchart images for completeness, a simple graph plotting distro vs. time (s) would be appreciated as an excutive summary

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Woodbridge, VA
    Posts
    116

    Default

    Keep in mind the focus for the 10 second goal on netbooks was changed to apply to a UNE session boot not a full gnome session as far as I am aware. Although gnome did benefit a lot from the speed boosts, it does have a few things slowing it down that aren't in UNE like compiz (UNE uses mutter).

    There are some charts here for a full gnome session on a dell mini 10v though that may be interesting
    http://people.canonical.com/~scott/daily-bootcharts/

    uwgandalf: There are some problems you could be hitting if you have a custom fstab holding up plymouth from loading until really late since they decided not to put it in the initrd for everyone unless they have cryptsetup installed. Running these two commands from a terminal should make it much nicer looking though, I recommend everyone using KMS on lucid to do it

    echo FRAMEBUFFER=y | sudo tee /etc/initramfs-tools/conf.d/splash
    sudo update-initramfs -u

    to revert it just sudo rm /etc/initramfs-tools/conf.d/splash and sudo update-initramfs -u.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Poland
    Posts
    197

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by xeros View Post
    That looks like side effect of the upgrade from 9.10 to 10.04.
    nope, clean 10.04RC install.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    7

    Default standardized procedure...

    >After installing Ubuntu i386 to each netbook (except for the x86_64 edition with the ASUS 1201N.
    You are meant to compare the devices in EQUAL conditions!
    It might not have had a huge effect on the boot time, but still, I consider this as bad manners and something that you should be more careful with in future tests. I understand that phoronix is place of numbers, benchmarks and comparison charts, but if you want to keep it like that, at least FOLLOW THE PROCEDURE!

    Also, is it that difficult make a little bar chart comparing boot time in addition to bootchart output? You know, it is not very netbook friendly if you just want to get the general idea and instead of having a quick look at the bar chart I have to click on the bootchart output and scroll around.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    7

    Default

    I didn't measure the time. But my Netbook boots "fast enough". It may be more than 10s but not much.

    On my desktop it's also very fast. In fact POST takes much longer than to get to the login screen of both Windows 7 or Ubuntu 9.10.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Misel View Post
    I didn't measure the time. But my Netbook boots "fast enough". It may be more than 10s but not much.

    On my desktop it's also very fast. In fact POST takes much longer than to get to the login screen of both Windows 7 or Ubuntu 9.10.
    That is probably because you have AHCI activated in BIOS which slow things down on some motherboards (e.g. my ASUS P5B). It takes me ~30s to get until grub and only ~17s to get to gdm.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    233

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sarvatt View Post
    uwgandalf: There are some problems you could be hitting if you have a custom fstab holding up plymouth from loading until really late since they decided not to put it in the initrd for everyone unless they have cryptsetup installed. Running these two commands from a terminal should make it much nicer looking though, I recommend everyone using KMS on lucid to do it

    echo FRAMEBUFFER=y | sudo tee /etc/initramfs-tools/conf.d/splash
    sudo update-initramfs -u


    to revert it just sudo rm /etc/initramfs-tools/conf.d/splash and sudo update-initramfs -u.
    This makes Plymouth work as it should! Thanks Sarvatt!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •