Page 7 of 17 FirstFirst ... 56789 ... LastLast
Results 61 to 70 of 170

Thread: Is Windows 7 Actually Faster Than Ubuntu 10.04?

  1. #61
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Third Rock from the Sun
    Posts
    6,582

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BlackStar View Post
    Nice work, Michael!

    The most important results are without doubt those of XPlane, Unigine and SPECviewperf,
    Not sure how important SPECviewperf tests are when there is only one app in the tests that has a linux version still.

  2. #62
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    18

    Default

    I would recommend the author of this article to display the results differently once you have the MacOS results in. In this article the graphs where unreadable. There were too many lines and it became almost impossible to keep track of which color was associated with which system and OS, especially if you are partially colorblind.

    So I would suggest that you separate the line graphs by system in the next run. Yes it will result in many more graphs, but that also means more displayed ads which for you is a good thing.

    The tables were great and actually saved the article from being unreadable.

  3. #63
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Hellas
    Posts
    1,022

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by deanjo View Post
    Ya, don't know what is up with the server. But going back the scheduler improvements found in Win 7
    Yup, 2.6.28 is very old as well and Linux scheduler is improved a lot for desktops since 2.6.32.
    The truth is one. Almost everyone (including me) believed till today that windows had the upper hand by a large marging in games. It has been proved that's not the case.

  4. #64
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Hellas
    Posts
    1,022

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by deanjo View Post
    Not sure how important SPECviewperf tests are when there is only one app in the tests that has a linux version still.
    And games for Linux are rare as well, but that does not mean that the game tests don't have their importance.

  5. #65
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Third Rock from the Sun
    Posts
    6,582

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Apopas View Post
    The truth is one. Almost everyone (including me) believed till today that windows had the upper hand by a large marging in games. It has been proved that's not the case.
    That can't be truthfully said without test runs on DX as well. Like many other applications the ogl / DX performance can differ greatly especially in the unigine benches.

  6. #66
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Hellas
    Posts
    1,022

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by deanjo View Post
    That can't be truthfully said without test runs on DX as well. Like many other applications the ogl / DX performance can differ greatly especially in the unigine benches.
    True, but still Linux can be tweaked a lot as well, so we will never be able to run a really objective test. Take for example that even Fedora (which is not as tweaked as Gentoo for example) was much much faster than Ubuntu with NVidia drivers. Over 50% if I recall correctly. Both me and you pointed that there is a problem with games in Ubuntu.
    Think it in another way also, even if DX runs games faster than GL (not necessarily true though), the difference won't be that high to say that windows is the undisputable leader in games performance.

  7. #67
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Hellas
    Posts
    1,022

    Default

    Damned 1 minute limit

    I believe, for example, that my Gentoo is gonna be faster than windows in the same machine, in almost every game. But Gentoo is not a desktop OS, so it doesn't count for many people. I use it as a desktop OS though.
    So what do we have if we remove every subjective point of view and stay with the sheer numbers?

  8. #68
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Third Rock from the Sun
    Posts
    6,582

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Apopas View Post
    True, but still Linux can be tweaked a lot as well, so we will never be able to run a really objective test. Take for example that even Fedora (which is not as tweaked as Gentoo for example) was much much faster than Ubuntu with NVidia drivers. Over 50% if I recall correctly. Both me and you pointed that there is a problem with games in Ubuntu.
    Think it in another way also, even if DX runs games faster than GL (not necessarily true though), the difference won't be that high to say that windows is the undisputable leader in games performance.
    That is all dependent on the implementation of course but one thing that has been shown over and over again for example is that unigine is a lot faster using DX. Also many apps are profiled and optimized in the windows drivers for their DX engines and may not have a ogl profile. 10 years ago you didn't see DX engines in professional CAD / Modelling / etc but now days pretty much all the major players default to a DX engine.

  9. #69
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    983

    Default

    Looks like the Phenom Quad-Core @ 2.20GHz system with HD 5770 was CPU limited in most benchmarks both on Linux and Windows. So it got a rather poor showing compared to the HD 4670 .

  10. #70
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    60

    Default

    Nice tests. Looking forward for the follow up.

    For somebody looking for a medium PC configuration to run Linux on it, I found AX3 configuration to fit that role beautifully. It was on par with Windows on almost all gfx tests. The ATI Radeon HD 4670 seems to perform very nice and the drivers seems to be mature for this video card.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •