Page 4 of 8 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 73

Thread: Mac OS X 10.6.3 vs. Windows 7 vs. Ubuntu 10.04 Benchmarks

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Linuxland
    Posts
    5,195

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Enrox View Post
    A benchmark I would love to see: Photoshop CS5 on OS X and Windows 7... you know... real stuff that matters
    Doesn't run on Linux, thus doesn't matter, thus moot point :P

  2. #32
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    5

    Default

    Hi,
    Can you guys run some test with and without compiz enabled? From my and others experiences this can lead to great performance differences in OpenGL games. Especially in wine - as I heard that you want to test wine performance too

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    97

    Default

    Sluggish performance in 3d with Mac OSX?
    Fix: Increase the resolution

  4. #34

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kraftman View Post
    I'd like to see some encoding, decoding, unpacking, compressing, computation benchmarks. Speed of creating, deleting, copying files, directories. This is what's important on desktops IMHO.
    Btw. it will be interesting to see how BFS performs in such tasks too, but I know all of this takes much of time. Maybe just some quick run in the near future?

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Hellas
    Posts
    1,099

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Enrox View Post
    Vista-bashing in 2010 is quite pathetic.
    Games on Vista get about the same FPS as XP or Windows 7, sometimes more sometimes less but overall it's the same.
    Same or not maybe there are dudes aroubd who would love to see proof of that.

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    3,799

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Apopas View Post
    Same or not maybe there are dudes aroubd who would love to see proof of that.
    Here you go:

    http://www.google.com/#hl=en&source=...99b07aefa0d9cc

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Hellas
    Posts
    1,099

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RealNC View Post
    interesting...

  8. #38
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    3,181

    Default

    The early DX10 drivers that came out with Vista were poorly optimized and the reason a lot of people still think gaming on Vista is slow. If you stick a recent driver on Vista it runs about the same as Win7 (the Vista service packs also helped a lot)

  9. #39
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    15

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kraftman View Post
    On the Server results could be worse
    And let it be worse

    Quote Originally Posted by kraftman View Post
    I'd like to see some encoding, decoding, unpacking, compressing, computation benchmarks. Speed of creating, deleting, copying files, directories. This is what's important on desktops IMHO.
    Up do a certain point. To be 10-20% faster or slower in file operations doesn't make any difference on a client, if you need performances you won't get them replacing the OS... but simply replacing the hardware.
    Do you need to read or to write at 250 MB/s or more? Just get a couple of SSDs in raid 0. End of story.

    Computation benchmarks? It's just a CPU bound issue, what could you expect? A 50% difference between Ubuntu and Windows? No way, it might end up to less then 5%... again, it doesn't make any real difference.

    Benchmarks are meaningful to compare a new software version to make sure there are no regressions compared to the previous version, doing cross OS benchmarks to figure out who is peeing farthermost is pointless

    I hope you didn't need Phoronix benchmarks to figure out that GPU drivers are more efficient under Windows 7

    I would be interested in evaluating specific softwares on different platform to have a overall result of the application software + the operating system. Example: Photoshop on OS X and Windows 7. Not to determine if OS X is better than Windows 7, just to figure out if Photoshop runs better on one of the two OSs. Very likely it won't and it might be just about the same. And anyway, with different software you might get opposite results, just like different GPUs with different games or different resolutions/details levels.

    At the end of the day I need to get the job done, not to go telling that my OS is 3% faster than the competition

    So I welcome real user scenario benchmarks of real client software running on client OS... not fake test running server software on a client OS.

  10. #40
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    15

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Apopas View Post
    Same or not maybe there are dudes aroubd who would love to see proof of that.
    There were plenty of those tests to compare Vista and XP (*)... as soon as nVidia got it's stuff together, Vista scored just a little bit better results than XP... so what's your point? We are in 2010 still flaming on things that were already known in 2008? Come on!


    (*) Vista users should have been interested in knowing if Vista was doing well against the previous version of Windows... doesn't make any sense to complain if Windows 7 is faster!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •