Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 22

Thread: Red Hat Talks About Nouveau, Open-Source Drivers

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    13,419

    Default Red Hat Talks About Nouveau, Open-Source Drivers

    Phoronix: Red Hat Talks About Nouveau, Open-Source Drivers

    As part of a series of blog posts and video interviews about new features coming to Fedora 13, Red Hat has most recently published a new item entitled Making 3D Free for Innovation: Fedora 13 Graphics Drivers...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=ODI0MA

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    1,987

    Default

    I would really like to see some major source, like RH, make particular mention of the GMA500/Poulsbo driver problem (also known as "lack of a driver"). Instead, every one of these "we're so great" statements that come out conveniently ignores it.

    And the fact of the matter is that GMA500 and soon GMA600 are MAJOR problems since these are the only graphics parts that intel HAS that in any way are actually better than the products sold by AMD or NVIDIA (simply due to the fact that neither AMD not NVIDIA even HAVE a product filling that segment), and the segment that those parts fill is ENORMOUS.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Berlin, Germany
    Posts
    790

    Default

    Let's face it, the market share of GMA500 is not large enough to be incentive for a major reverse-engineering effort.

    So it depends on Intel to provide drivers for their chipsets. Until that happens, for most Linux distros GMA500 will simply not exist. Complain to Intel if you don't like that.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    2,264

    Default

    The rate at which the growth rate of Linux' marketshare is growing is exponential. There are other options like radeon so the FLOSS graphics availability is secured.

    The obvious fix is not buying Intel. That'll teach them a lesson...

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    315

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by V!NCENT View Post
    The rate at which the growth rate of Linux' marketshare is growing is exponential. There are other options like radeon so the FLOSS graphics availability is secured.

    The obvious fix is not buying Intel. That'll teach them a lesson...
    Ya I think redhat has gone from 12.5 million or so users last year to probably something rediculous like 40 60 million after 13 release. It's just exploding and not slow motion.

    And for Intel GMA 500. They are all grown up and involved in the Linux world. They can either get it done or ignore it. Their choice. If there's 3rd party licensing problems learn how to negotiate.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    510

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by V!NCENT View Post
    The rate at which the growth rate of Linux' marketshare is growing is exponential.
    Not exponential, but linear. This may change with Android (not taken into account here), which *is* growing exponentially at the moment. The question is whether it will continue to do so. Plus, you're not going to be playing state of the art games on your smartphone.


  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    983

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by V!NCENT View Post
    The rate at which the growth rate of Linux' marketshare is growing is exponential. There are other options like radeon so the FLOSS graphics availability is secured.

    The obvious fix is not buying Intel. That'll teach them a lesson...
    Not buying GMA500/600 is a great idea. Not buying Intel stuff at all is a horrible idea.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    944

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by whizse View Post
    Not buying Intel stuff at all is a horrible idea.
    Why?

    (this is just to make the message longer than 10 characters)

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    983

    Default

    Do I really need to spell this out?

    Intel is a large company, employing a lot of developers to work on and support Linux, in many cases having the best support available today.

    Telling people to not buy any of their products because of the PowerVR fiasco will send the wrong message. By all means, don't buy the GMA500/600 stuff, but an all out boycott of Intel will result in a lot of collateral damage.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    101

    Default

    It would be really nice if AMD came out with a GPU positioned as a direct competitor to GMA500/600, but with open-source support. I would definitely be willing to buy a netbook with such a chipset (assuming it didn't go with Broadcom for WiFi).

    As for boycotting Intel, I am already conducting a "partial boycott" of Intel. Naturally, I refuse to purchase anything with a GMA500/600 GPU, and I urge others not to purchase it either, but I also try to limit my purchases of Intel hardware in general. For one thing, I think Intel's market share is cause for concern, especially since they have demonstrated a willingness to abuse it. Secondly, I want to help AMD maintain their position as a competitor to NVIDIA. If Intel is the only reasonable option, though, I will purchase their hardware. For example, I am looking for a new notebook, and whatever I purchase will almost certainly contain an Intel CPU and GPU.

    I really do feel betrayed by Intel over the GMA500/600 thing, though. That was not cool, and it definitely does not encourage me to purchase Intel hardware when AMD gets the job done just as well.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •