Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 24

Thread: How VIA Could Have Not Screwed Its Linux Chances

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    14,373

    Default How VIA Could Have Not Screwed Its Linux Chances

    Phoronix: How VIA Could Have Not Screwed Its Linux Chances

    Yesterday we reported on how VIA's open-source Linux dreams are not materializing and then this morning reported on a new secret driver being developed (xf86-video-openvia) between VIA Technologies, some VIA "friends", and the OpenChrome developers. However, as I said in this morning's VIA article, the situation is still a murky mess, this new OpenVIA driver isn't receiving much work, the DRM code with TTM/GEM memory management is still missing, and these open-source efforts by VIA are not very well organized...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=ODI4Mw

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    My Parents Basement
    Posts
    52

    Default

    A very constructive article, good work. Hopefully some bosses at VIA will read this. Let's hope it helps.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    5,411

    Default

    i think the NDA is abaut the via-DX11 hardware

    via do not try to get opensource drivers for the past hardware dx9 and dx10.1

    via try to get DX11 hardware with only opensource drivers like intels IGPs..

    VIA do not have the manpower to get a new driver for an old product.


    thats it! just wait for the DirectX11/openGL4 based VIA hardware and you will see a opensource driver!

  4. #4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Qaridarium View Post
    i think the NDA is abaut the via-DX11 hardware

    via do not try to get opensource drivers for the past hardware dx9 and dx10.1

    via try to get DX11 hardware with only opensource drivers like intels IGPs..

    VIA do not have the manpower to get a new driver for an old product.


    thats it! just wait for the DirectX11/openGL4 based VIA hardware and you will see a opensource driver!
    No, NDAs are being used for old documents and such right now. It's been that way already for a number of months.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    87

    Default Community

    It seems to me that they are just following the 10 steps to destroy your community (also on video).

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    5,411

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Michael View Post
    No, NDAs are being used for old documents and such right now. It's been that way already for a number of months.
    as i know they don't wana support opensource drivers for old hardware they only wana support opensource drivers on the new hardware generation!

    means they don't care abaut the old documents they don't wana let them NDA free!

    like intel in the past opensource drivers but no open-spec

    VIA don't care about there OLD products!

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Owatonna, Minnesota, USA
    Posts
    98

    Default

    VIA is a strange company in my eyes. They make a great budget-value CPU line (the Nano) and a budget-value GPU line (S3 is owned by VIA.)

    Seeing as how they are consistently slow on getting their products to market (the Nano 3000 series is still M.I.A. and the S3 store hasn't had anything in stock for about a year at least), I doubt they're going to change anytime soon.

    It seems they just want to release limited quantity value products with poor driver support and then move on to the next product line.

    VIA doesn't seem to care about increasing their market share or image. Nvidia should have bought them out (rumors say they were considering it.) At least then they would have better drivers (even if they would be proprietary) and their image wouldn't suck as bad.

    Maybe they are planning to change their ways, maybe not. The coming months will tell.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    353

    Default

    VIA just doesn't work as hard as would-be-winners are supposed to work, if they're so passive I say let them continue fading away with their tiny market share.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Hellas
    Posts
    1,027

    Default

    Very good article Phoronix!

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    205

    Default

    How about via just go and die off already?? They're just getting squeezed by intel with atom on the high end and by arm with cortex on the low end.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •