Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234
Results 31 to 40 of 40

Thread: openSUSE 11.3 Pulls In New Kernel & More

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    122

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by monraaf View Post
    There's only so much PR can do to overshadow Novell's shady Microsoft dealings. SuSe Linux was actually my first Linux distro. But nowadays I wouldn't touch it with a ten-foot pole.
    Any sensible reason? Opensuse has nothing to do with Microsoft at all.

  2. #32
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    684

    Default

    There is no sensible reason, people love to hate on novell for absolutely no reason, its annoying.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Novell#...with_Microsoft

    That "shady deal" is what everyone gets so up in arms about.

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    3,776

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bwat47 View Post
    There is no sensible reason, people love to hate on novell for absolutely no reason, its annoying.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Novell#...with_Microsoft

    That "shady deal" is what everyone gets so up in arms about.
    And then, those same people, go and use Gnome which embraces Mono/.NET, the result of the Novell/MS deal.

    Go figure.

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    122

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RealNC View Post
    And then, those same people, go and use Gnome which embraces Mono/.NET, the result of the Novell/MS deal.

    Go figure.
    ...glorifying Canonical and using Ubuntu, which forces user to install mono (mono is default component, Ubuntu does not have configurable installation)

    Opensuse does not install mono by default, and if some installation scenario include mono packages, you can kick them out and lock before installation itself.


    PS.: It is funny Microsoft contributed more lines of code under GPL, then most of distributions these p ideological purist love

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    984

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bwat47 View Post
    There is no sensible reason, people love to hate on novell for absolutely no reason, its annoying.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Novell#...with_Microsoft

    That "shady deal" is what everyone gets so up in arms about.
    That "no sensible reason" is what caused a Novell employee to resign.

    Jeremy Allison Has Resigned from Novell to Protest MS Patent Deal

    The legendary Jeremy Allison (of Samba fame) has resigned from Novell in protest over the Microsoft-Novell patent agreement, which he calls "a mistake" which will be "damaging to Novell's success in the future."

    His main issue with the deal, though, is "that even if it does not violate the letter of the licence, it violates the intent of the GPL licence the Samba code is released under, which is to treat all recipients of the code equally." He leaves the company at the end of this month. He explained why in a message sent to several Novell email lists, and the message included his letter to management:

    "Whilst the Microsoft patent agreement is in place there is *nothing* we can do to fix community relations. And I really mean nothing," Allison wrote. "Until the patent provision is revoked, we are pariahs....Unfortunately the time I am willing to wait for this agreement to be changed ...has passed, and so I must say goodbye."
    But no need to rehash all this. Novell made a mistake and is now tainted because of that deal. If you wan to use Novell openSUSE that's fine with me. I don't, and they can keep their Mono shit also. Which is a big failure anyway.

  6. #36
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Third Rock from the Sun
    Posts
    6,582

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by monraaf View Post
    That "no sensible reason" is what caused a Novell employee to resign.

    But no need to rehash all this. Novell made a mistake and is now tainted because of that deal. If you wan to use Novell openSUSE that's fine with me. I don't, and they can keep their Mono shit also. Which is a big failure anyway.
    People quit for idiotic reasons and paranoia all the time. The feelings of one developer is hardly proof of anything. I mean hell Shuttleworth stepped down at Ubuntu so that must mean it's not worth the effort right?

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    122

    Default

    Even Microsoft could be trapped in consequences of the deal:

    http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publ...l_defenses.pdf

    GPL has not been tested in Patent litigation yet, but if the precedent listed in thesis above is useful, hypothetical agreement allowing Novell to distribute MS IP under GPL would lead to inability to sue in future. It make sense, because you can not approve to distribute GPL code, and then use patents to forbid rights GPL grants to user.

    But this is just theory, afaik MS-Novell deal covers customers, not both companies.

  8. #38
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    984

    Default

    Just a little more context for those who have forgotten.

    "We've had an issue, a problem that we've had to confront, which is because of the way the GPL (General Public License) works, and because open-source Linux does not come from a company -- Linux comes from the community -- the fact that that product uses our patented intellectual property is a problem for our shareholders. We spend $7 billion a year on R&D, our shareholders expect us to protect or license or get economic benefit from our patented innovations. So how do we somehow get the appropriate economic return for our patented innovation, and how do we do interoperability. The truth is, because of the complex licensing around the GPL, we actually didn't want to do one without the other.

    "What we were able to craft, with a lot of hard work with Novell, was an agreement essentially where we would do the technical work in a variety of different areas to improve interoperability between the two environments. And we agreed on a, we call it an IP bridge, essentially an arrangement under which they pay us some money for the right to tell the customer that anybody who uses Suse Linux is appropriately covered. There will be no patent issues. They've appropriately compensated Microsoft for our intellectual property, which is important to us. In a sense you could say anybody who has got Linux in their data center today sort of has an undisclosed balance sheet liability, because it's not just Microsoft patents. Because of the way open-source works, there's nobody who's been able to do patent coverage or patent indemnification behind that.

    "So we built a technology bridge, and we built an IP bridge and a commercial framework that supports that. Novell said to us, 'Hey, look, if you're serious about this stuff, you better help us promote Suse Linux.' To which we said, 'You know we're trying to sell Windows, that's what we do for a living! Windows, Windows, Windows, baby! We don't do Linux that way here.'

    "What we agreed, which is true, is we'll continue to try to grow Windows share at the expense of Linux. That's kind of our job. But to the degree that people are going to deploy Linux, we want Suse Linux to have the highest percent share of that, because only a customer who has Suse Linux actually has paid properly for the use of intellectual property from Microsoft. And we took a quota, you could say, to help them sell so much Suse Linux. That's part of the deal. We are willing to do the same deal with Red Hat and other Linux distributors, it's not an exclusive thing. But after a few years of working on this problem, Novell actually saw the business opportunity, because there's so many customers who say, 'Hey look, we don't want problems. We don't want any intellectual property problem or anything else. There's just a variety of workloads where we, today, feel like we want to run Linux. Please help us Microsoft and please work with the distributors to solve this problem, don't come try to license this individually.' So customer push drove us to where we got.

    Steve Ballmer CEO, Microsoft

  9. #39

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bwat47 View Post
    There is no sensible reason, people love to hate on novell for absolutely no reason, its annoying.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Novell#...with_Microsoft

    That "shady deal" is what everyone gets so up in arms about.
    I would rather blame Novell and their enterprise distro and not OpenSuse. When OpenSuse switched to KDE some Novell Gnome and mono fanboys were attacking people from OpenSuse who made such decision.

    Original thread:

    http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-p.../msg00548.html

  10. #40

    Default

    @Monraaf

    Great quote, thank!

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •