Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 21

Thread: Ubuntu To Pull In New Versions Of Firefox

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    248

    Default

    whole KDE SC has point releases which mostly bug fix but sometimes also add some things ...

    Not including them was always stupid to me and now FF gets an exeption...

    Time for kubuntu devs to think about the same policy for point releases of KDE

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Wrocław/Poland
    Posts
    37

    Default

    Breaking News!

    Ubuntu now will zero /tmp on boot.

    In other news:

    Ubuntu switching default wallpaper from sandy-sand to curly-light-gray.
    Ubuntu switches to libjpeg8. (<fanfares>)



    Degradation of importance of topics being covered by Phoronix is worrying me a bit...

  3. #13

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by EarthMind View Post
    Why not do it with all software and stop releasing new versions of Ubuntu each 6 months. Of course kernel updates shouldn't be installed automatically and should be marked as optional.

    They could still release a new Ubuntu every year, to update the artwork and other trademark changes.
    That is a good idea. Canonical should do that.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Poland, Warsaw
    Posts
    73

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by chrisccoulson View Post
    Lucid will get Firefox 4.0 as 3.6.x approaches EOL
    Are You sure? Then why Fx 3.6.4 is going to be pulled into not only Lucid, but also Hardy, Jaunty and Karmic? After all, Karmic uses Fx 3.5; it's still supported and will be for a couple of months...

    I really hope Canonical will upgrade Fx major versions asap, not when approaching EOL. BTW, it would be also easier for them to maintain (one Fx version for all systems).

    So, again - are You sure?

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    58

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by chrisccoulson View Post
    This policy is specific to Firefox at the moment (and also Chromium), due to the way their support models work. There is no need to apply the same policy to other software that doesn't present the same maintenance challenges.



    Lucid will get Firefox 4.0 as 3.6.x approaches EOL
    Since FFox 3.6.3 is buggy as a wasps_nest ... and about as friendly, who cares how quickly it updates? It's kinda like the rest of LL_10.04 ... every update destroys another piece of working function. UP->down ... back-> forth. Slither sidewayz. From one web_surf to the next you really don't what or know how disfunctional the browser will be.

    Mebby it's time for M$ to buythemout and (*TM) make-stuff-work !

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    248

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by val-gaav View Post
    whole KDE SC has point releases which mostly bug fix but sometimes also add some things ...

    Not including them was always stupid to me and now FF gets an exeption...

    Time for kubuntu devs to think about the same policy for point releases of KDE
    Exactly... and I also do hope we will get those point releases ... If Gnome did those Canonical would for sure include them ...

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    248

    Default

    How tired can one be to reply to his own post ?

    *stupid one minute time limit*

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Poland, Warsaw
    Posts
    73

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jaxjoe View Post
    Since FFox 3.6.3 is buggy as a wasps_nest ... (...) every update destroys another piece of working function.
    I haven't experienced such behaviour, all works perfectly (apart from keywords for default search engines which get erased after each update). Maybe uninstall ubufox package, it can make a lot of mess...

    If major updates will be performed only after the product goes EOL, I'm a bit disappointed...

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    201

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by srg_13 View Post
    Finally... This is one of my biggest annoyances with Ubuntu! Part of the reasons that I usually run the developer releases is because of it having the newer version.
    https://launchpad.net/~mozillateam/+...firefox-stable

    Quote Originally Posted by val-gaav View Post
    whole KDE SC has point releases which mostly bug fix but sometimes also add some things ...

    Not including them was always stupid to me and now FF gets an exeption...

    Time for kubuntu devs to think about the same policy for point releases of KDE
    They even announce this on kubuntu.org whenever there's a point release:
    https://launchpad.net/~kubuntu-ppa/+archive/ppa

    Pretty much every major package has a ppa.. you can run as bleeding-edge as you like.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    248

    Default

    my point was the point releases should be updated in main repo not in external ppa.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •