Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 24

Thread: SPARC, IA64 Ports Of Ubuntu Face Decommissioning

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    14,335

    Default SPARC, IA64 Ports Of Ubuntu Face Decommissioning

    Phoronix: SPARC, IA64 Ports Of Ubuntu Face Decommissioning

    While Ubuntu and its derivatives (such as Ubuntu Server and Ubuntu Netbook) are most popular on x86 and x86_64 systems along with a growing presence on ARM-based devices, ports of Ubuntu have been available for SPARC and IA64 architectures too. However, as the quality of these ports have been degrading, the IA64 and SPARC ports of Ubuntu Linux may be decommissioned during the Ubuntu 10.10 "Maverick Meerkat" development cycle...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=ODMyNQ

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    288

    Default

    Sad... The SPARC port has degraded probably because sun was stupid enough to discontinue their workstation line. Where a lot of the porting and maintainance was likely done.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    3,046

    Default

    Indeed. There's still some promise within the SPARC line as an architecture- but if you can't lay your hands on usable machines to maintain or even USE the SPARC version of Ubuntu,...

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    52

    Default

    Sadly I'm not surprised - the world is prolly going to be amd64, arm, and everything else, in that order. (although MIPS might be big in a few years if the Chinese chips become 'good enough', thinking about it...)

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    The intarwebs
    Posts
    385

    Default

    As long as I've still got my PowerPC port, I'm good.

    Ubuntu is targeting the *desktop*. Very few of us G4 and G5 users, but we are out there. Sparc and IA64? Mmmhhhh, dunno.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Saskatchewan, Canada
    Posts
    460

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cb88 View Post
    Sad... The SPARC port has degraded probably because sun was stupid enough to discontinue their workstation line.
    Much as I liked my old SPARC machines, building a SPARC workstation which can compete against a $1000 PC running Linux (or OpenSolaris) is a tough job.... SPARC is much more competitive in the server market.

    As for IA64, I didn't even realise they still existed .

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    25

    Default

    That's fine. Debian is still out there supporting the most exotics cheese graters.

    And for the other side, SPARC and IA64 are strong cpus, enough for making his own gentoo build in a blink of an eye

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    25

    Default

    Canonical needs to change some of his ways to make ubuntu in order to, at least, think about entering in the twilight zone of non-x86 servers.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Saskatchewan, Canada
    Posts
    460

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by frostwarrior View Post
    Canonical needs to change some of his ways to make ubuntu in order to, at least, think about entering in the twilight zone of non-x86 servers.
    I'm not so sure: Ubuntu isn't really a player in the 'serious' server market which might have SPARC or IA64 CPUs instead of x86... I have it on my MYthTV/NFS server box at home but it changes too much too fast for me to risk it on a server that does real work.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    64

    Default

    IA-64 aka Itanium is dead and for SPARC-based systems Solaris is a much better choice.

    And even SPARC is nearing the grave. New workstations with SPARC-CPUs are non-existent today. The last SPARC-based workstation was built by SUN in 2008. And on servers x86-CPUs offer a much better performance/price-ratio than SPARC-based systems.

    So why should Canonical still support this CPUs?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •