Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 26

Thread: Mutter Can Cause A Gaming/OpenGL Performance Hit Too

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    270

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by V!NCENT View Post
    Yeah you posted that twice. How about a reality check so that your ego can have a rest, shall we?

    A while back people wanted to know just how much compositing window managers would affect overal performance. Michael posted the results.

    Right now Michael came back with Mutter added to the known results with Metacity and Compiz required in current form to compare.

    The title was Mutter can cause a performance hit too. This, however, was not a test of whether Mutter would actually cause a performance hit (y/n) but a continuation of previous findings in that Mutter also causes a big difference.

    Sure 2D WM draws to a framebuffer directly while with compositing the 2D drivers just update an offscreen part of the framebuffer while the 3D drivers put together these pieces and draw the actual end result. When in fullscreen 3D the compositing WM's can sorta turn themselves 'off', which shows an incredible performance boost.

    Get over it, smartass...
    I am going to second that (except for the last line).

    By the way; is it just me, or is "Mutter" a really bad name for anyone who knows a little bit German?

    For example: "Michael has just tested Mutter".
    I don't want to be picky about names because I generally don't care but English and German are both not my first language and even I think it's a really bad name.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Toronto-ish
    Posts
    7,574

    Default

    It can't be as bad as "diseased cod"

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    2,264

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MaestroMaus View Post
    By the way; is it just me, or is "Mutter" a really bad name for anyone who knows a little bit German?

    For example:"Michael has just tested Mutter".
    Gnome fan: "Kwin is bloated".
    KDE fan: "Lol... Yo Mutter is so fat, she weights more than Metacity and Compiz combined!"
    Gnome fan: "Wait-... no.. hey!"
    KDE fan: "Yo Mutter is so fat, when a user click on Activities, she displays all your virtual desktops on one screen!"
    Gnome fan: "STOP IT!"

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    106

    Default

    Am i the only one missing kwin in the test?

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    120

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by V!NCENT View Post
    Gnome fan: "Kwin is bloated".
    KDE fan: "Lol... Yo Mutter is so fat, she weights more than Metacity and Compiz combined!"
    Gnome fan: "Wait-... no.. hey!"
    KDE fan: "Yo Mutter is so fat, when a user click on Activities, she displays all your virtual desktops on one screen!"
    Gnome fan: "STOP IT!"
    Your mutter is so FAT, she's being sued by Microsoft for patent infringement.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    206

    Default Come on

    Yeah just another headline. How many window managers do you plan to benchmark the next weeks?

    Phoronix starts to annoy me.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    2,264

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 3vi1 View Post
    Your mutter is so FAT, she's being sued by Microsoft for patent infringement.
    Loooool! Hahahaha xD
    Yo Mutter is so fat, she needs LLVM and a Core i7 just to run at acceptable framerates without hardware acceleration!

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    912

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by V!NCENT View Post
    Loooool! Hahahaha xD
    Yo Mutter is so fat, she needs LLVM and a Core i7 just to run at acceptable framerates without hardware acceleration!
    I was under the impression gcc still produced faster code? Perhaps it should be "she needs icc" (the intel compiler).

    Jokes aside, and despite some people upset over the title (I would think it obvious that any sort of compositing environment might have some 3D overhead), the actual performance hit of any overhead is good to have tested.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    2,264

    Default

    @mirv,
    In case you missed it:
    Mutter doesn't have software/framebuffer fallback and as a result LLVM-softpipe is required for JIT compiling as Mesa-softpipe is too slow

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    912

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by V!NCENT View Post
    @mirv,
    In case you missed it:
    Mutter doesn't have software/framebuffer fallback and as a result LLVM-softpipe is required for JIT compiling as Mesa-softpipe is too slow
    Ahh, cheers. Yes, I did miss it (sorry, long day).

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •