Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Ubuntu 10.10 Now Supports Installing To Btrfs

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    13,430

    Default Ubuntu 10.10 Now Supports Installing To Btrfs

    Phoronix: Ubuntu 10.10 Now Supports Installing To Btrfs

    Back in May during the Ubuntu Developer Summit for Ubuntu 10.10 (the "Maverick Meerkat") we reported on Canonical's plans for Btrfs in 2011 and 2012 and even that Btrfs could be the default file-system in Ubuntu 10.10. While EXT4 will likely remain the default file-system choice with Ubuntu Maverick, as of the latest daily ISO spins there is now support for installing Ubuntu to a Btrfs file-system...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=ODM1OQ

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    52

    Default

    I wonder how long till it will become stable and usable mainstream.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    64

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SkyHiRider View Post
    I wonder how long till it will become stable and usable mainstream.
    At least Edward Shishkin (RedHat, formerly working on Reiser4) calls it's design completely broken:

    http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/994558
    http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux....58/focus=41965


  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    35

    Default

    Has anybody ever lost any data with btrfs? I actually lost data with ext4 way after it was supposed to be stable, but I've switched almost all my partitions to btrfs a month ago and I've yet to see any problem at all.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    35

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by puntarenas View Post
    At least Edward Shishkin (RedHat, formerly working on Reiser4) calls it's design completely broken:

    http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/994558
    http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux....58/focus=41965

    Did you actually read the discussion? Mason seems to be confident that those problems can be fixed.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    48

    Default

    Can anyone confirm that it is available? I have today's daily-live and don't see the option in ubiquity manual partitioner.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    16

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by puntarenas View Post
    At least Edward Shishkin (RedHat, formerly working on Reiser4) calls it's design completely broken:

    http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/994558
    http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux....58/focus=41965

    That's what happens if a single person has a half-assed go at something (BTRFS) or if there's a team of people actually designing something (ZFS).

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    6

    Default

    I'm still hoping that Reiser4 gets merged into the mainline kernel some day. It's still being developed, with up-to-date kernel patcches available on kernel.org:

    http://kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/p...iser4-for-2.6/

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Peterborough
    Posts
    376

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by puntarenas View Post
    At least Edward Shishkin (RedHat, formerly working on Reiser4) calls it's design completely broken:

    http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/994558
    http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux....58/focus=41965

    I really hope Btrfs doesn't become another "academic" open source project, becoming nothing useful because the developers do not wish to compromise the *perfection* of their design.

    *cough* GStreamer and PulseAudio *cough*

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Linuxland
    Posts
    4,734

    Default

    83% overhead on a fs is what I'd call pretty fscking bad.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •