Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 19

Thread: A CUDA Back-End For Intel's Open-Source Driver?

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    15,098

    Default A CUDA Back-End For Intel's Open-Source Driver?

    Phoronix: A CUDA Back-End For Intel's Open-Source Driver?

    While there is the "Clover" branch of Mesa started by Zack Rusin for providing an OpenCL state tracker that can be used by Gallium3D hardware drivers, it hasn't yet amounted to much. The OpenCL state tracker is not yet working, hasn't been touched in months, and has yet to be integrated in the mainline Mesa code-base. However, as another GPGPU alternative, it looks like a CUDA back-end that's specific to Intel's open-source driver may end up being worked on...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=ODM2Mg

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    270

    Default

    Seriously, Cuda? On Intel IGP's? Am I the only one who thinks this is one of the most stupid ways of burning recources that could be used a lot better somewhere else?

    I mean; hardly anyone uses Cuda and those who do probably need a lot more then a miserable Intel IGP will offer. So who is going to use this? What is the point of making this?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    249

    Default

    Just another proof that the graphic stack development for linux is, generally speaking, clueless.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    14

    Default

    I think you two are clueless. This is a group of researchers interested in experimenting with GPGPU backends. They're probably not interested in what you're interested in. They're interested in IGPs specifically because they feel that CPU-GPU integration is relevant to their research. Nobody said they were releasing anything or contributing anything to the Intel driver...

    It's not brain surgery here, the guy's mail to the list is only 3 paragraphs long.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    5,411

    Default

    don't waste your time on intel or nvidia get that stuff: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/06...pu//print.html

    Passiv cooled :-)

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    111

    Default

    I don't get it.

    If they are really that intersted into CPU/GPU stuff why strive for CUDA that was designed for GPU only?

    I mean hack, OpenCL was at least designed with CPU in mind.
    Yeah I know that to get very good performance you still have to write code specifically for CPU or certain types of GPUs, but still why CUDA?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    2,264

    Default

    Why? Because they can and any knowledge can be usefull for noveau. Next.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    437

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Qaridarium View Post
    don't waste your time on intel or nvidia get that stuff: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/06...pu//print.html

    Passiv cooled :-)
    Hah, what a joke, you really think you could rely on Fglrx to do scientific calculations? I couldn't even manage to get compiz to run on it good enough!

    Hardware, no matter how good it is designed, without brilliant software, is a pile of electric trash, period.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    111

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FunkyRider View Post
    Hah, what a joke, you really think you could rely on Fglrx to do scientific calculations? I couldn't even manage to get compiz to run on it good enough!

    Hardware, no matter how good it is designed, without brilliant software, is a pile of electric trash, period.
    Just because you can't do it does not mean that others are as incompetent as you are.

    I can use OpenCL with ATI cards and AMD (and Intel via AMD) CPUs as I can with Nvidia GPUs. So don't make things look bad while they aren't.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Third Rock from the Sun
    Posts
    6,584

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Qaridarium View Post
    don't waste your time on intel or nvidia get that stuff: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/06...pu//print.html

    Passiv cooled :-)
    Once again you show how little you know. They are not passively cooled. They rely on the 1u chassis to cool them. Nvidia does the same thing.

    ATI





    Nvidia





    Thanks for coming out.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •