Page 4 of 6 FirstFirst ... 23456 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 53

Thread: 5870 future prospects

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Toronto-ish
    Posts
    7,386

    Default

    Whoops, maybe the other users said the problem was introduced between 10.4 and 10.5, not between 10.5 and 10.6

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    30

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bridgman View Post
    Whoops, maybe the other users said the problem was introduced between 10.4 and 10.5, not between 10.5 and 10.6
    The odd thing is that I think you're right and that some people were reporting issues with 10.5 -> 10.6, just that I and some other unlucky people had issues with >10.4

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    89

    Default

    Firstly many thanks for the disucussion its been mostly helpfull but it does
    raise a number of points.
    I have been using Linux since kernel 0.96d that is since 1993. In the past
    it usually has taken at least 2 to 3 years to get a decent OS 2D plus 3D driver
    for a graphics card. As I under stand it the current OS support for the R600
    GPU's has been around for around about that length of time and is just now
    starting to hit its straps. As far as I am concerned there is no problem with
    the development delay.

    Some posters seem to have missed a bit here, what I am talking about is
    future open source support. If you wait until OS support for the 5870 to
    become stable then the card will be well and truely gone from the shops.
    There of course will be newer cheaper cards availble but still with poor or
    no open source support. So I am willing for the wait.

    I am currently working on a terrain rendering application that has
    demomstrated it will use as much triangle and texture drawing rates as one
    can throw at it and still get a below average result (Note 1). So there is a
    requirement for a better GPU. On the development machine I currently have a
    Gigabyte NVidia GTX260 superoverclock card in it. It is slightly faster then
    my Sapphire 4870 once you screw up the Antialiasing and such settings.
    Interestingly the 4870 does not slow down the frame rate at all when you
    screw up the settings the result on the screen just gets better.

    While $650 Australian is a fair bit of cash I do not have a TV or mobile
    phone, I do not go out much living in VERY rural Australia. So the
    computers are very much a central part of the entertainment outside of my
    Workshop and Railway work. I do final have a fast internet connection
    although it is still basicly dialup. Decent broadband is unlikely ever to be
    out here.

    Note 1: In Linux of course. This is on the whole a research exersize to see
    how realistic you can render a landscape. This eats Vertex's (and textures)
    like there is no tomorrow, essentially if you double the viewing distance
    the number of Vertex's goes up by a factor of between 4 and 8 a landscape
    of course being in 3 dimensions.

    Blacksmith

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    89

    Default

    Oops I missed a a bit I on the whole have never had much trouble with FGLRX this is the driver I currently use on my test machine (not the development machine).

    Blacksmith

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    5,411

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kano View Post
    First of all it is called Bluray and when you have got a full hd display you usually want to watch full hd content. If you want to talk about Judas go to a priest. I prefer working solutions and no ideological bullshit like you.
    Judas is just a Metaphor for Betrayal no priest is needet for talk about backstabbing.

    "and when you have got a full hd display you usually want to watch full hd content."

    do you mean the DHCP (High-bandwidth Digital Content Protection) Display ?

    to buy a "High-bandwidth Digital Content Protection" Display is backstabbing to!
    your full hd content is just a DRM full-Copyprotection content means there is no HD-Content!

    "I prefer working solutions"

    you prefer to not have any opensource solution you are a FAKE linux user!

    because (vbox+windows)to cack bluray isn'T 100% opensource!

    FAKE! KANO=FAKE!

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    6,607

    Default

    I just got a i3-680 won H55 to try vaapi via open source driver, enough for you? You can not test that with ATI.

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    5,411

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kano View Post
    I just got a i3-680 won H55 to try vaapi via open source driver, enough for you? You can not test that with ATI.
    you fail my point there is no HD content !

    there are only fully crappy HDCP-Cloused-source-only fake-HD-Content.

    and H264 is a patented-anti-opensource fake codex to!

    you just test FAKE-Codex-Acceleration on Fake-HDCP-content.

    just FAKE!

    and yes you can'T test this fake on AMD hardware !

  8. #38
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    6,607

    Default

    Look into a mirror to see a fake.

  9. #39
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    5,411

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kano View Post
    Look into a mirror to see a fake.
    oh well show us a Real WebM VP8-gpu-acceleration solution with true opensource hd content.

  10. #40
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    5,411

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •