Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 37

Thread: LLVMpipe Still Is Slow At Running OpenGL On The CPU

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Toronto-ish
    Posts
    7,572

    Default

    It's a bit like video rendering - anything which requires data transfer back and forth kills performance, but you can sometimes keep things on the CPU a bit further down the pipe before transferring to the GPU and executing the rest of the pipeline on the GPU.

    It's unlikely that you would ever want to do pixel rendering on CPU if you had any kind of GPU available, but CPUs can be pretty good at vertex processing. The classic scenario for this is a high end CPU paired with IGP, which is not that unusual.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Linuxland
    Posts
    5,333

    Default

    But how does Fusion affect this? There's a damn direct, short copper line straight between the two, they use the same ram..

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    2,145

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by curaga View Post
    But how does Fusion affect this? There's a damn direct, short copper line straight between the two, they use the same ram..
    That is **EXACTLY** the same thing I was thinking about.
    And correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't that the WHOLE POINT of Fusion/APU's?

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    144

    Default

    I am very excited about this fusion stuff. Am I correct in my analysis that this can create some quite powerful small devices? Think graphics power comparing to top of the line GPU's now along with some nice strong CPU all in an mini-ITX form factor. Actually being able to play decent games on a tiny media center running linux

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Linuxland
    Posts
    5,333

    Default

    I read somewhere that the first fusion cpus will have graphics comparable to HD5450, low-end r800. Will improve later, hopefully.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    784

    Default

    Well, fusion doesn't magically solve the heat problem. Try cramming a high-end 6-core and a 5890 into a single package, then try keeping it cool without liquid nitrogen. Doesn't work so well.

    There will be several fusion chips with different tradeoffs between CPU and GPU power. It'd make sense to start with the models with low-end GPUs: it's enough for office work and HTPCs (assuming UVD works), so it's probably the configuration that's expected to sell best. More models can be delivered later to suit different needs.

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    2,264

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rohcQaH View Post
    Well, fusion doesn't magically solve the heat problem.
    Not to mention it shares the same serial access memory and does the Fusion CPU also get its own framebuffer, crtc and port connectors, or... ? Because in that case you still have to have a seperate (partial) VGA and so it would only benifit OpenCL(-ish stuff) (for now).

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    3,046

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FunkyRider View Post
    Dynamic load balancing, we already have that, it's called SLI
    No, this is a smidge different and hasn't even really been done yet. Larabee MIGHT have brought the start of that sort of thing to the picture, but sadly it's not going to be hitting the market as a discrete GPU, now is it?

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Near Grenoble (the French Alps)
    Posts
    1

    Lightbulb what about including Intel IGP ?

    Quote Originally Posted by jrch2k8 View Post
    ... in any case compare it against an intel crappy igp

    btw push 28 fps cpu only is quite an achievement
    I think it could be interesting to compare this software driver with an intel IGP as it may be the #1 client for this kind of driver.
    I personnally own a 9800 GT and will never think about using this software driver (and for any Nvidia/Ati solution); but on M/B with intel integrated video, for me, it make sense to compare it with any kind of intel dedicated drivers (open/closed source) or other software solution like Mesa.

    Hope it will come with the next Mesa soft. vs LLVMpipe bench.

  10. #30

    Default

    Yes Intel IGP is already done as part of next comparison. Mesa Software Rasterizer was thrown out though since it can't break 1FPS.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •