Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12

Thread: GNOME 2.31.4 Is Ready For Some Testing Love

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    14,911

    Default GNOME 2.31.4 Is Ready For Some Testing Love

    Phoronix: GNOME 2.31.4 Is Ready For Some Testing Love

    It should come as no surprise that there is now a new GNOME 3.0 test release seeing as in the past couple of days we have talked about new development releases of GNOME Shell and Mutter, GTK+ 3.0, and Clutter 1.3/1.4, along with a slew of other GNOME packages being checked-in...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=ODM5MA

  2. #2

    Default

    It would be interesting to see for a comparison of resources comsumption (RAM, CPU, disk-IO) of last versions of KDE, Gnome, and maybe XFCE or others...

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    991

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by malkavian View Post
    It would be interesting to see for a comparison of resources comsumption (RAM, CPU, disk-IO) of last versions of KDE, Gnome, and maybe XFCE or others...
    Been there done that.



    http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?pag...p_vitals&num=1

    Not likely much has changed with regard to resource consumption since then.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    6,634

    Default

    Not really anything changed in the PTS code. I don't think it was fixed. Did you compare with htop? If it would be a bash only part i would fix it, but that's too much php in that section.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    991

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kano View Post
    Not really anything changed in the PTS code. I don't think it was fixed. Did you compare with htop?
    Me no. I prefer a usable desktop without eye-candy crap and a gazillion configuration options that only get in the way. So KDE was never an option for me, even if it didn't suck in resource usage.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    6,634

    Default

    You showed a graph with wrong results not me...

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    991

    Default

    I just copy-pasted the graph from the article. It's not my responsibility if the results are right or wrong.

  8. #8

    Default

    Ops, ok, thank you, I didn't know that article, altough I might... is from march...

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    6,634

    Default

    And its incorrect.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    174

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by monraaf View Post
    Been there done that.



    http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?pag...p_vitals&num=1

    Not likely much has changed with regard to resource consumption since then.

    This has been discussed a lot over the years, but you do know that the graph is completely useless right?

    Different OS's and desktop environments use memory differently, and KDE's memory usage has always appeared high because it keeps a lot of items loaded into ram. What's the point of having 4 gigs of memory if most of it sits unused? Buffer up as much as possible.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •