Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14

Thread: GCC 4.5.1 RC1 Released; Final Due By August

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    14,565

    Default GCC 4.5.1 RC1 Released; Final Due By August

    Phoronix: GCC 4.5.1 RC1 Released; Final Due By August

    Richard Guenther of Novell has just announced the first release candidate for GCC 4.5.1, which will be the first point release following the April release of GCC 4.5.0...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=ODQzNQ

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Under the bridge
    Posts
    2,128

    Default Yes, I'm kidding

    Novell?! So, Micro$haft is infecting GCC now, too? Bye bye GCC, clang here I come.

  3. #3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BlackStar View Post
    Novell?! So, Micro$haft is infecting GCC now, too? Bye bye GCC, clang here I come.
    What? This article says nothing about Microsoft...

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    49

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BlackStar View Post
    Novell?! So, Micro$haft is infecting GCC now, too? Bye bye GCC, clang here I come.
    Very nice

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    2,123

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BlackStar View Post
    Novell?! So, Micro$haft is infecting GCC now, too? Bye bye GCC, clang here I come.
    Quality flamewar introduction. Just what I need in the holidays

  6. #6

    Default

    And no word about ill famed bug 40838.

    I'm with GCC 4.2.4 again.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    /dev/random
    Posts
    218

    Default

    Novell also develops X, the linux kernel, gnome, kde, and more.

    Have fun knowing that.

  8. #8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by phoronix View Post
    Phoronix: GCC 4.5.1 RC1 Released; Final Due By August

    Richard Guenther of Novell has just announced the first release candidate for GCC 4.5.1, which will be the first point release following the April release of GCC 4.5.0...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=ODQzNQ

    I have posted about the MPC support being nothing more than the substitution of a fork of GMP for GMP in the past. GMP was forked by MPC's developers because GMP's developers are hostile to supporting windows and embedded systems. To suggest GCC's switch from GMP to MPC is a significant improvement in GCC is a pure lie. The two are binary compatible, so it is likely possible to compile GCC 4.5 with either one of them and not have any issues.

    Honestly, I wish that Phoronix would demonstrate knowledge in the areas it reports.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Under the bridge
    Posts
    2,128

    Default And yes, I'm still kidding

    Quote Originally Posted by some-guy View Post
    Novell also develops X, the linux kernel, gnome, kde, and more.

    Have fun knowing that.
    See? The infection is spreading, I knew it! Next thing you know, Micro$$aft will be extending "patent covenants" to X, the kernel, gnome and more. (KDE will be exempt, since it's copying the Vista looks.)

    So kill it! Kill it with fire before it's too late!

  10. #10

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BlackStar View Post
    See? The infection is spreading, I knew it! Next thing you know, Micro$$aft will be extending "patent covenants" to X, the kernel, gnome and more. (KDE will be exempt, since it's copying the Vista looks.)

    So kill it! Kill it with fire before it's too late!
    When Gnome copies Win95 look then it's ok, so don't worry about KDE. You're funny reaction doesn't change the fact Mono is used in Gnome and it's not used in GCC, Linux, X, KDE. Kill Mono and ximians not Novell.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •