Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 29

Thread: Here's The R600 Gallium3D Driver Running Gears

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    2,929

    Default

    I don't know. ATi stuff has had OpenGL 2 for a very long time, plus there is the entire power management stuff.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Poland
    Posts
    72

    Default

    Gallium3D == OpenGL 2.1. Even r600g claims it supports that version...

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    MK, UK
    Posts
    27

    Default

    well, i ve just upgraded to OS 11.2 and with the newer 2.6.34 kernel and its the first time i have had 2d/3d accelartion out of the box so to speak on my HD4830. i know im runningthe classic mesa driver and its so much faster starting X then the catalsyst although ut2004 is a little laggy. i think it will be better for bits from the r300 driver to be graffted on.


    fingers crossed...........

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    624

    Default

    I wouldn't say nouveau development is more active than ATI one, at least on the 3D side. nv50 seems to be the only nouveau driver being actively developed and it's basically a one man show (though the man is totally awesome).

    nvfx (nv30/nv40) is currently dead, there is simply no developer which has time, knowledge, and hardware to be able to develop it. The driver is currently more or less broken and some very important fixes and improvements for it are spread across several branches in mesa git, in case anybody cares.

    Wielkie G> Actually, no. You can even create an OpenGL 1.3 driver in Gallium.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    315

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pingufunkybeat View Post
    I don't know. ATi stuff has had OpenGL 2 for a very long time, plus there is the entire power management stuff.
    The opengl stuff isn't anything to do with ati or nvidia. It's done by an entirely different team from what I understand.
    I just checked it with wine today and unfortunately it's giving 2.1 support but it seems to be using software rasterizer under wine.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    99

    Default AMD

    It is amazing to me that such huge corporation (AMD) cannot simply assign 30 or 40 developers to get job done FAST and then leave 4-5 to maintain quality. According to Google Finance AMD has 10649 employees. I guess 10647 of that number are taking care everything runs well on Windows.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    1,633

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mirza View Post
    It is amazing to me that such huge corporation (AMD) cannot simply assign 30 or 40 developers to get job done FAST and then leave 4-5 to maintain quality. According to Google Finance AMD has 10649 employees. I guess 10647 of that number are taking care everything runs well on Windows.
    That number is mostly uninteresting because AMD is not a software-development company. The more interesting is how many full-time software developers they have.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    772

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mirza View Post
    It is amazing to me that such huge corporation (AMD) cannot simply assign 30 or 40 developers to get job done FAST
    r600g is not a big collection of independent modules that can each be readily assigned to a different developer. Trying to split it up among 30 or 40 developers would probably make it take longer.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    770

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mirza View Post
    It is amazing to me that such huge corporation (AMD) cannot simply assign 30 or 40 developers to get job done FAST [..]
    money-issues aside: project management simply doesn't work that way.
    Even if you could find 30 or 40 developers with enough GPU knowledge, adding that amount of people would more likely stall development than speed it up. Dependencies (can't build the roof before the basement is done), coordination overhead, lengthy geek-discussions on how to do it "right", ...

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    2,929

    Default

    IIRC, AMD is already allocating more devs to Linux drivers than Windows drivers when compared to the corresponding market share.

    Still, the rate of development has slowed down somewhat since the latest batch of power management patches. For example, there has been no news on colour tiling (patches are still not in git). I guess that the Evergreen and r600g transition are soaking up all the available manpower.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •