Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread: Testing Intel's New GLSL Mesa Compiler With ATI Graphics

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    14,350

    Default Testing Intel's New GLSL Mesa Compiler With ATI Graphics

    Phoronix: Testing Intel's New GLSL Mesa Compiler With ATI Graphics

    With Intel developers earlier this week expressing their plans to merge their new GLSL compiler into Mesa by the end of next month, which besides providing various shader compiler optimizations and being a better framework going forward is already set to correct 50+ bugs, we decided to try out this Mesa "GLSL2" compiler. However, as Intel explicitly stated they haven't tested this new GL Shading Language compiler that's been in development for months with any other hardware drivers (or even Gallium3D) besides their own Intel DRI driver, we decided to see how well it works with the open-source Radeon classic and Gallium3D drivers. It ended up being both good and bad.

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=15140

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    France
    Posts
    275

    Default

    What about performance? What kind of improvements can we expect?

    The last 3 articles are awesome Michael, it reminds me very well why I like to visit phoronix.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Poland
    Posts
    215

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MPF View Post
    What about performance? What kind of improvements can we expect?

    The last 3 articles are awesome Michael, it reminds me very well why I like to visit phoronix.
    Yes, we'd like to see a benchmark and some picture quality comparision between old and new GLSL compiler (even some screenshots from working fine games, too).

    Btw. good to know that it's working better than expected.
    I've expected more problems with ATI cards, too.

  4. #4

    Default

    Benchmarks are coming in another, later article.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Linuxland
    Posts
    4,991

    Default

    Hm, no reference "correctly rendered" screenshot?

    I don't play Warsow, so I have no idea what it's supposed to look like...

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    74

    Default

    So with this new compiler how would the radeon(r300c) driver compare with the gallium driver?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    3,035

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rob2687 View Post
    So with this new compiler how would the radeon(r300c) driver compare with the gallium driver?
    This is used by both classic and gallium drivers, so there shouldn't really be any difference.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    37

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MPF View Post
    What about performance?
    Performance comparisons would have to be limited to those benchmarks/games, where image quality and complexity is exactly the same. Otherwise the "broken" driver/GLSL compiler may drop textures and oversimplify the situation for later render stages and thus result in higher framerates.

    Has been observed multiple times with broken drivers.

    Quote Originally Posted by MPF View Post
    The last 3 articles are awesome Michael, it reminds me very well why I like to visit phoronix.
    Agreed!

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    609

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rob2687 View Post
    So with this new compiler how would the radeon(r300c) driver compare with the gallium driver?
    r300c doesn't support GLSL, so any improvements there are out of the question.

    r300g may benefit from this, but only in apps which use GLSL! (i.e. not the quake3 engine)

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    2,926

    Default

    Later versions of ioquake3 do use GLSL for some effects.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •