Page 1 of 9 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 82

Thread: Benchmarks Of The Gentoo-Based Calculate Linux

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    14,356

    Default Benchmarks Of The Gentoo-Based Calculate Linux

    Phoronix: Benchmarks Of The Gentoo-Based Calculate Linux

    Traditionally at Phoronix we have stayed away from publishing benchmarks of Gentoo and similar source-based distributions for the lack of them having a standard or "stock" configuration for which one can easily replicate our tested software stack due to all of the different variables that come into play so the value of these benchmarks are much less compared to those distributions providing pre-compiled binaries for a standardized set of packages. However, satisfying a number of requests, we are publishing such benchmarks today. Rather than using Gentoo itself for benchmarking, we are using Calculate Linux Desktop, which is Gentoo-based while providing a very nice "out of the box" experience, i686 and x86_64 binaries, and overall is a polished and user-friendly Gentoo experience.

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=15170

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    9

    Default

    First of all: thanks for the benchmarks.

    However, this is a slap in the face for all Gentoo users: you were,
    as I understood, asked to perform a comparison against Gentoo. Instead, you pick some random distribution with *binary* packages, which are also pretty outdated. Calculate Linux is not Gentoo, despite it is being based on.

    To clarify the point of Gentoo (IMHO, of course):
    - CPU-optimized compilation of source packages
    - availability of most recent packages (e.g. GCC, Glibc, X11, ...)

    Please: either work out a proper benchmark, or, if you can't, just do not mention "Gentoo" in your article titles!

    Thanks!
    paravoid


    Quote Originally Posted by phoronix View Post
    Phoronix: Benchmarks Of The Gentoo-Based Calculate Linux

    Traditionally at Phoronix we have stayed away from publishing benchmarks of Gentoo and similar source-based distributions for the lack of them having a standard or "stock" configuration for which one can easily replicate our tested software stack due to all of the different variables that come into play so the value of these benchmarks are much less compared to those distributions providing pre-compiled binaries for a standardized set of packages. However, satisfying a number of requests, we are publishing such benchmarks today. Rather than using Gentoo itself for benchmarking, we are using Calculate Linux Desktop, which is Gentoo-based while providing a very nice "out of the box" experience, i686 and x86_64 binaries, and overall is a polished and user-friendly Gentoo experience.

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=15170

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    4

    Default graphs

    Please, for easier viewing consider doing the following:
    When you have multiple test-systems and are *not* comparing the systems, give them separate scales.

    Avoiding graphs like this should be a high priority, as one side of it is completely useless...
    [img]http://www.phoronix.com/data/img/results/calculate_gentoo_benchmarks/7.png[img]

    thanks for the tests, anyway, though what most people asking for gentoo benchmarks likely want is likely far from these benchmarks

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    15

    Default

    Interesting, will have a look into the bzip and gzip numbers.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Linuxland
    Posts
    4,993

    Default

    In before "Gentoo's not supposed to be faster until it's completely built for the exact cpu"

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    15

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by curaga View Post
    In before "Gentoo's not supposed to be faster until it's completely built for the exact cpu"
    A common misconception, its usually faster due to USE flags keeping your system down to what you use only.

    This can have the reverse effect also, with a Gentoo system being more bloated because the user has enabled every USE under the sun.

    Gentoo is always going to have the "ricer" reputation I suppose


    [In before http://funroll-loops.info/]

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    358

    Default

    In general, performance improvements due to CPU-specific compiler optimizations are minimal, if at all visible. (If you need good performance, there is no way around custom intrinsic/asm code.)

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    2,926

    Default

    Yeah, but performance improvement due to, say, disabling Java in OpenOffice, or disabling PulseAudio systemwide is considerable.

    And you can't do this easily with a binary distro.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    270

    Default

    Sigh...

    Really, why try to please the clueless part of the Gentoo users?

    Everyone with a little bit of common sense knows that we can't benchmark Gentoo reliably because person A's Gentoo isn't person B's Gentoo. They know it, we know it, so why try?

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MaestroMaus View Post
    Sigh...

    Really, why try to please the clueless part of the Gentoo users?

    Everyone with a little bit of common sense knows that we can't benchmark Gentoo reliably because person A's Gentoo isn't person B's Gentoo. They know it, we know it, so why try?
    *sigh* This is just the point. Gentoo is not a general purpose Linux distribution. Instead, one can tweak the O/S to the maximum, which you cannot do with any other distribution.

    You say we can't benchmark it ? IMHO, it would be interesting to see the performance numbers from the Phoronix benchmark. But only, if the system is tuned properly. Using stock Gentoo, for example, won't gain much performance I believe.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •