Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 21

Thread: The ATI R600/700 DDX & Mesa Now Have Tiling In Place

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    13,403

    Default The ATI R600/700 DDX & Mesa Now Have Tiling In Place

    Phoronix: The ATI R600/700 DDX & Mesa Now Have Tiling In Place

    Now that the Linux 2.6.36 kernel is set to ATI R600/700 tiling support within the Radeon DRM code, patches for hooking into this tiling support have been committed to the xf86-video-ati DDX and the classic Mesa DRI R600 drivers...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=ODQ4MA

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    437

    Default

    Finally! Rush out and buy a HD 4870. EOL.... Wooooooooot????

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    2,264

    Default

    This has got me thinking; back in the day, at least, only the expensive radeons had thermal sencors made available, while the 'celeron' versions of these card also had the sencors but were disabled by the driver.

    So... does this now mean that we'll alwas have thermal sencors on even the lower range of cards?

    Awesome xD

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    2,273

    Default

    Older cards didn't have internal thermal sensors so it was not a matter of them being disabled. They were external i2c chips, so either the card had one or it didn't.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    2,264

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by agd5f View Post
    Older cards didn't have internal thermal sensors so it was not a matter of them being disabled. They were external i2c chips, so either the card had one or it didn't.
    This was back when the there were two 9800pro's out there: the r350 version and the r360 version (9800 XT).

    If my memory serves me well, the r360 9800 Pro was actually a 9800 XT but without the thermal sencors, or at least it may had them but you couldn't overclock it because you couldn't read them with a user space app to see how hot it would get. So the overclocking goodness was reserved to the 9800 XT, although you could flash it with 9800 XT firmware and them you had a 9800 XT.

    I also remember people taking pencils to restore some damaged circuitry xD

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    2,273

    Default

    R3xx asics did not have internal thermal sensors; it was introduced rv6xx asics. R3xx boards used external i2c thermal chips like the lm63 or lm64 if the OEM chose to.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    2,264

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by agd5f View Post
    R3xx boards used external i2c thermal chips like the lm63 or lm64 if the OEM chose to.
    Ah I see. ATI doesn't make their own cards (anymore), right?
    But yeah that was probably the case

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    3,762

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by V!NCENT View Post
    Ah I see. ATI doesn't make their own cards (anymore), right?
    But yeah that was probably the case
    What you said can still be true. I don't see why an I2C would make any difference. agd5f only said that it wasn't an internal sensor, not that what you said wasn't true.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    2,273

    Default

    We make a few, but most are built by board partners.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Linuxland
    Posts
    4,725

    Default

    Benchmarks of this feature?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •