Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Intel's 2D Performance With X.Org Server 1.9

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    14,333

    Default Intel's 2D Performance With X.Org Server 1.9

    Phoronix: Intel's 2D Performance With X.Org Server 1.9

    X.Org Server 1.9 is set to be released as soon as next week, has already been pulled into Ubuntu 10.10, and is part of the X.Org 7.6 katamari. While X.Org Server 1.9 does not bring many exciting end-user changes like previously releases that introduced RandR 1.2, Multi-Pointer X / X Input 2.0, and other new technologies, there are plenty of bug fixes and other minor improvements throughout the X Server. In this article, we are looking at how the Intel DDX driver performance changes when upgrading from X.Org Server 1.8.2 to the latest X.Org Server 1.9 development code.

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=15202

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    28

    Question

    Are you using mplayer with XvMC and h264? How do you do that? My mplayer doesn't even have an xvmc h264 codec. How's the difference between xv and XvMC?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    358

    Default

    XvMC only supports MPEG-2.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    28

    Default

    then how does he play FullHD h264 on a netbook with only 70% cpu??

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    358

    Default

    He doesn't -- the video doesn't run in realtime. As I have pointed out already in another thread, this is a pointless benchmark. The average CPU load of little more than 50% is due to how load is measured on a HTT CPU.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    322

    Default

    Fuck j00 spammer p00...
    Time to set us up the bomb.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •