well i thougth that it would be awesome to see something like this into the linux world
but alas...i dont whant to put a bad name on me or the linux world -_-
Wasn't there also a Direct X port of Quake 1 before the source was released? As I recall, it was supposed to have been done by some intern at Microsoft who was a little bored or something...
Anyway, it's a BAD IDEA to do anything with pirated source code.
well i thougth that it would be awesome to see something like this into the linux world
but alas...i dont whant to put a bad name on me or the linux world -_-
As an observation, if you're in possession of said leak, you're not going to want to use it. It's NOT something you want to own up to having- not to mention the fact that there's good odds that it's not going to be quite the same game because they re-worked things as a result of the leak.
You COULD port it, yes. But you wouldn't want to.
Uh, I wouldn't be wanting to own up to this, if it were me. You are making an unauthorized distribution of Valve's software if you provide that to ANYONE else. As of right now, I'm flagging this post.
Here's a hint. If it's about to be available from Valve, your doing this will see to it that it WON'T be. I am going to be ferociously blunt here. We don't need people doing what you're proposing. You're not doing ANYONE, yourself included, any favors by even talking about doing this.3.2 reasons, one is pesure and 2cnd one is linux needs more games damn it :S (yes i know steam is going out for linux soon but i cant wait, better use whats on the field)
You just offered to distribute the code at the beginning of this post. Which is it?4. i wouldn't distribute it, at least i would do the same what garrysmod.org did
If you really want to bring more games to Linux, I'd say your time is better spent porting something like Ya3dag: http://www.ya3dag.de/page_about.html
(or any other FLOSS Windows-only game)
Heh... It was done with an unauthorized release, but not an unauthorized copy. The original port was done by an iD employee, one Dave Taylor, using his access to the source code in question to produce the version in question, and released the first couple of releases without iD's permission. If it was the same thing, you'd not have had the patches pushed back into the source tree like they were with that situation.
hi there,well i don't so it possible because of directx 9 program....