Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 22

Thread: Ubuntu's SPARC & IA64 Ports Have Been Killed

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    13,474

    Default Ubuntu's SPARC & IA64 Ports Have Been Killed

    Phoronix: Ubuntu's SPARC & IA64 Ports Have Been Killed

    A few months back we reported that the IA64 and SPARC versions of Ubuntu were in trouble and would be decommissioned if no individual(s) were to step-up and maintain these ports of Ubuntu Linux for these architectures that are much less popular and common than x86 and x86_64 hardware. Well, there still is no one backing the Intel IA64 and Sun SPARC versions of Ubuntu Linux so they are being dropped completely...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=ODUxNw

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    60

    Default

    i'm kind of surprised that they would let the sparc drop after recent developments.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    1,567

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by xir_ View Post
    i'm kind of surprised that they would let the sparc drop after recent developments.
    Kinda fits the pattern though. They've been dropping one arch after another.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    1,567

    Default

    Kinda intriguing also that they are encouraging people to stop using x86_64 in favour of x86 too though. XD
    Need proof? http://www.ubuntu.com/desktop/get-ubuntu/download "64-bit - Not recommended for daily desktop usage"

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    271

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nanonyme View Post
    Kinda intriguing also that they are encouraging people to stop using x86_64 in favour of x86 too though. XD
    Need proof? http://www.ubuntu.com/desktop/get-ubuntu/download "64-bit - Not recommended for daily desktop usage"
    I saw that the other day when I had to get an updated ISO. I searched and found a bug report to remove that message which was more or less denied, with the rationale that Flash didn't work on 64 bit well so it was appropriate. Seems ironic when the primary reason for non-64 bit software being the uptake of 64 bit OS's...

  6. #6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nanonyme View Post
    Kinda intriguing also that they are encouraging people to stop using x86_64 in favour of x86 too though. XD
    Need proof? http://www.ubuntu.com/desktop/get-ubuntu/download "64-bit - Not recommended for daily desktop usage"
    I don't recommend 64-bit for daily desktop usage either.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    71

    Default

    I've been using 64bit since Nintendo 64 and a 64bit sun ultra 2 it works great

    sparc despite having open blueprints is dead, only jive corporate twits are into it, ia64, forget it

    x86_64 is fantastic

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    1,567

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LightningCrash View Post
    I don't recommend 64-bit for daily desktop usage either.
    Meh, 64bit works fine given you have some distro that handles multilib sanely like eg Fedora, OpenSolaris or (supposedly) Gentoo with multilib overlay.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Linuxland
    Posts
    4,754

    Default

    ... or don't use crap that requires 32-bit, and run a pure 64 system.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    1,567

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by curaga View Post
    ... or don't use crap that requires 32-bit, and run a pure 64 system.
    Well, the only Flash that works everywhere (on x86 machines) for everything is the 32bit Adobe Flash in a 32bit browser. That's how it's done on Windows, that's how you have to do it if you want a good Flash experience on other operating systems.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •