Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13

Thread: An Update On The SystemD System & Session Manager

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    14,548

    Default An Update On The SystemD System & Session Manager

    Phoronix: An Update On The SystemD System & Session Manager

    There's an update on systemd by Lennart Poettering, the Berlin developer that created this project to serve as a new system and session manager for Linux. The systemd manager is compatible with existing SysV and LSB init scripts while it leverages D-Bus activation, heavily supports parallelization, and has many other features that makes it of interest to distribution vendors and end-users. Red Hat has already switched from SysVinit to systemd with Fedora 14 and judging from Lennart's blog post today it will likely gain more acceptance based upon the recent improvements...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=ODUzOA

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    48

    Default

    Sounds like something to try and benchmark

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    233

    Default

    You forgot to commend the last part of the web page http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd

    Packages:

    Fedora (Where we are: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/piper...ly/138855.html)

    OpenSUSE (Instructions: http://en.opensuse.org/SDB:Systemd)

    Debian

    Gentoo

    ArchLinux

    Nope, no packages for Ubuntu. Go figure.
    bold added by me.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    31

    Default Fedora not using sysvinit

    Quote Originally Posted by phoronix View Post
    Red Hat has already switched
    I think it would be more accurate to say that they are in the process of switcing, since Fedora 14 isn't due to be released until November.

    from SysVinit to systemd with Fedora 14
    Fedora hasn't been using sysvinit for more than two years now. Starting with Fedora 9, Fedora has been using upstart.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Italy
    Posts
    82

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by wpoely86 View Post
    Sounds like something to try and benchmark
    See this comment by Lennart on LWN.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    716

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KDesk View Post
    You forgot to commend the last part of the web page http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd

    ...

    bold added by me.
    Surprised? SystemD is something new, under development primarily by a Fedora person, and not yet in any formally released distro. It may turn out to be the future, but why on earth would Ubuntu be supporting it already?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    985

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KDesk View Post
    You forgot to commend the last part of the web page http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd
    Nope, no packages for Ubuntu. Go figure.
    Now that's just silly Ubuntu/Canonical bashing, and IMO a little unprofessional to put that on the freedesktop Wiki.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Third Rock from the Sun
    Posts
    6,583

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by monraaf View Post
    Now that's just silly Ubuntu/Canonical bashing, and IMO a little unprofessional to put that on the freedesktop Wiki.
    Maybe Ubuntu/Canonical can put in a retort in their next upstream commit. Oh wait a minute.....

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    1,578

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Delgarde View Post
    Surprised? SystemD is something new, under development primarily by a Fedora person, and not yet in any formally released distro. It may turn out to be the future, but why on earth would Ubuntu be supporting it already?
    Well, xorg-edgers does exist, doesn't it? Ubuntu often packages stuff that's still in development. Then again, upstart is by Canonical and they Ubuntu guys might not be all too happy at a replacement coming in. I'd expect this to be the basis for the rather harsh comment. Suspicion that Ubuntu packagers are holding a grudge.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    716

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nanonyme View Post
    Well, xorg-edgers does exist, doesn't it? Ubuntu often packages stuff that's still in development. Then again, upstart is by Canonical and they Ubuntu guys might not be all too happy at a replacement coming in. I'd expect this to be the basis for the rather harsh comment. Suspicion that Ubuntu packagers are holding a grudge.
    That, and replacing your 'init' system isn't a trivial exercise. Replacing the X server with a bleeding-edge version is no big deal - it might not work, but it's easy to do, and easy to revert. The same can't be said for ripping out upstart or sysvinit and dropping in systemd instead.

    Besides, this kind of dispute is silly. Lennart and co have written a new init daemon, which Fedora and SuSe are adopting. That's nice, but why should Ubuntu immediately ditch the system they built, and move to the shiny new one? Remember, systemd is *very* new, less than a year old, and there's really no good reason for Ubuntu to adopt it just now.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •