Page 3 of 18 FirstFirst 1234513 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 174

Thread: Open-Source GPU Drivers Causing Headaches In KDE 4.5

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    2,937

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by allquixotic View Post
    It seems, out of that list, that Mesa has been doing the least over the past 8 years. I acknowledge the great achievements that have been made in the way of KMS, DRI2, GEM and so forth, but these projects and the way they disrupted development and developers have set Mesa back by many years, where progress was mostly stalled as developers waited for the memory manager and modesetting to take shape before they could work on 3d support. Then Gallium came and divided effort in half between the gallium and classic DRI drivers.
    Gallium is a response to the lack of development power and the need to share code across all of Mesa.

    DRI2/GEM/TTM are needed to move beyond OpenGL 1.5. It did not set back Mesa by many years, as Mesa couldn't move anywhere at all until DRI2/GEM/TTM were implemented.

    OpenGL 2 is impossible between these things. They had to be done.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    2,937

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by brent View Post
    By the way, I'm seeing no real efforts at all to get video decode acceleration (of any sort, ASIC or shaders) and GPGPU stuff (OpenCL) to work. It's just sad...
    There are probably tens of millions of Linux users in the world.

    None of them want to do it.

    That's why there is no work on video decode acceleration.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    351

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MaestroMaus View Post
    law: "Performance of computers is increased by 100% each three years"

    Look it up, it has applied since the very beginning up until now. I remember people thinking the same in the P4 days.
    No this is not a law.

    The law is that the size of transistor gates halves every 18 months appro.

    Double the amount of transistors doesn't equal double the performance though.

    And performance of a computer system as a whole is the synergy of cpu,gpu,bandwidth, storage devices,ram performance improvements...

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    270

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TemplarGR View Post
    No this is not a law.

    The law is that the size of transistor gates halves every 18 months appro.

    Double the amount of transistors doesn't equal double the performance though.

    And performance of a computer system as a whole is the synergy of cpu,gpu,bandwidth, storage devices,ram performance improvements...
    Never heard of that one before. I heard the one I mentioned from someone else and checking that one seems to be accurate.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    319

    Default

    So if we are to compare kwin with say something like gnome-shell as equals, granted the g-s developers are probably being funded to work on this more, but still I get regular reports from the g-s devs in RH on what drivers do and don't work and what features are slow and missing, and we try and target Fedora releases to make sure that the g-s bits work on the shipping drivers.

    The g-s guys understand the ecosystem they are working in, and work with it. The kwin guys seem to take 0 interest in working with a community. I've gotten driver patches from g-s guys, and never any contact from a kwin developer. Granted RH also would prefer that I make g-s work so it gets a higher priority than kwin or games.

    The thing is if kwin wants to be a Linux desktop it needs to run on top of Linux, not some ideal of what Linux should be if we had 50 more developers writing graphics drivers. Its called reality and generally living in it makes for a better quality of product.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    270

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by allquixotic View Post
    ...I was mistaken when I thought that audio would be a more showstopping issue for the Linux desktop than graphics. I was under the assumption that either the open drivers would catch up, or the proprietary drivers would support the same APIs the open drivers do (e.g. KMS). I was wrong on both counts. Audio problems have disappeared into the periphery for me; I rarely have any audio issues at all when using a modern Linux distro. But regardless of whether I'm using ATI's proprietary driver or the open drivers, I have always been disappointed by the graphics stack.
    Graphics have historically been a weak spot of Linux. If anything, the last years have been much, much more successful for Linux then any previous point in history. You do have to consider that Linux has known many, many years where the NV driver was the only option if you wanted to do anything serious with your GPU.

    Audio stack also hasn't caught up yet to Windows though...
    *wishes more features

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    2,937

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by airlied View Post
    So if we are to compare kwin with say something like gnome-shell as equals
    That's not quite right.

    Gnome-shell includes the functionality from both Kwin and Plasma.

    If Kwin developers are not checking for open drivers compatibility, then it's rather unfortunate. But they've done the same thing to the binary nvidia drivers when these were broken, so I don't think that it's a slight against the Mesa developers.

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    157

    Default

    Well, apparentely, Kwin devs are enthusiasts working on their own machines, not some paid developers by Red Hat having probably access to various hardware, thus are able to test it personnaly.
    Martin said in his blog that Kwin was trying to use functionnality advertised as supported, and that in fact it was not, making the fallbacks they have implemented useless. Since he doesn't have the equipment to test it, he obviously can't file bugs himself.
    It's likely that KWin devs should try to get more reports on different platforms instead of assuming that everything works as the binary Nvidia drivers, but you can't also ask the two or three Kwin devs, who work on their own, to be able to match a paid dev team, moreover working for the same company as the driver developper.
    I agree with Mr Bridgman approach, though. I assume Martin was on the defensive side with the bad reports coming with the KDE 4.5.X release, but blaming others is not constructive either.
    Hopefully, some good will come out of this and many bugs, revealed by this release, will be identified and fixed.

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    351

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MaestroMaus View Post
    Never heard of that one before. I heard the one I mentioned from someone else and checking that one seems to be accurate.
    It is called Moore's law and it is famous among computer scientists.

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    270

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rvdboom View Post
    Well, apparentely, Kwin devs are enthusiasts working on their own machines, not some paid developers by Red Hat having probably access to various hardwa...
    KDE doesn't fully exist out of volunteers either. Not communicating = doing a sloppy job.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •