Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 49

Thread: NVIDIA Says It Will Deliver ARM CPUs Spanning PCs to SCs

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    15,686

    Default NVIDIA Says It Will Deliver ARM CPUs Spanning PCs to SCs

    Phoronix: NVIDIA Says It Will Deliver ARM CPUs Spanning PCs to SCs

    NVIDIA has announced from the Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas that it's working to deliver ARM CPUs for a range of devices from PCs to super-computers. NVIDIA plans to build high-performance ARM CPUs for a range of devices, including servers and workstations. Internally this is being worked on at NVIDIA under the Project Denver codename...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=ODk4NA

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Columbus, OH, USA
    Posts
    323

    Default

    This may well be the most interesting prequel to a tech year in quite a while. Windows on ARM competing against the long-time stalwart Linux, in the ARM space? Desktop-class massively-parallel ARM/NV hybrid chips that do what Sandy Bridge does but better? Nvidia cutting into the space owned by Intel and AMD?

    This could be amazing.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    353

    Default

    It looks like x86 is not good enough these days since reports keep popping up that this and that company start supporting ARM. What does Intel plan to do to stop the spread of ARM which is increasingly likely to invade desktop PCs in the next 4-5 years (especially if windows 8 on ARM works well).

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    351

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cl333r View Post
    It looks like x86 is not good enough these days since reports keep popping up that this and that company start supporting ARM. What does Intel plan to do to stop the spread of ARM which is increasingly likely to invade desktop PCs in the next 4-5 years (especially if windows 8 on ARM works well).
    This has nothing to do with x86 being inferior.

    The future is APU, cpu and gpu combined. NVIDIA had 2 options, either develop/acquire a cpu part or have the fate of Matrox...

    They chose wisely the first option...

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Columbus, OH, USA
    Posts
    323

    Default

    I'd also be interested to see Intel take a stab at a desktop-class ARM, personally. They've ever been the CISC company (Well...I guess there was the Xscale PXA-series. Bummer about selling it to Marvell.) and they seem to be showing no signs of slowing when it comes to extending x86 with new instructions (), so I kind of wonder if an ARM they fabbed would flop horribly performance-wise (like Atom).

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    270

    Default

    Wow, 2011 is already more eventful and exciting then 2010!

    /me is eager to see the benchmarks of the NVIDIA CPU's...

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Under the bridge
    Posts
    2,153

    Default

    Nvidia has been turning away from the desktop market for some time, first with GPGPU-oriented GPUs, now with embedded-/small-server-class CPUs. This sounds like the culmination of that effort.

    I'm a pessimist but I firmly believe that ARM cannot compete with Intel/AMD on the desktop as things stand right now. X86 is just too strong for that, both performance-wise and support-wise.

    This doesn't mean that Nvidia will stop making dedicated video cards, but it does mean that it won't be able to compete with the CPU+GPU combos from Intel and AMD - which is becoming a very lucrative market.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Ghent
    Posts
    221

    Default

    I am currently a proud owner of a Toshiba AC100 (a Tegra2 "smartbook"), which I dual boot between Ubuntu-ARM and Android. I am currently trying to run as many PTS tests as possible on this device (currently from the Ubuntu-ARM on a SDHC card, not decided if it is worth it to try to flash it to the eMMC instead). I would love to try to do similar benchmarks under Android for comparisons. The general feeling is that Android is way faster than Ubuntu, but this may be due to proprietary driver issues etc, which may lead to an unfair comparison.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    351

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by staalmannen View Post
    I am currently a proud owner of a Toshiba AC100 (a Tegra2 "smartbook"), which I dual boot between Ubuntu-ARM and Android. I am currently trying to run as many PTS tests as possible on this device (currently from the Ubuntu-ARM on a SDHC card, not decided if it is worth it to try to flash it to the eMMC instead). I would love to try to do similar benchmarks under Android for comparisons. The general feeling is that Android is way faster than Ubuntu, but this may be due to proprietary driver issues etc, which may lead to an unfair comparison.
    Ubuntu is much more demanding than Android, it is a desktop OS, not a smartphone OS...

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    158

    Default

    Imagine if AMD or Intel would reveal (plans for) a CPU which was capable of both x86 and ARM instruction sets. That would have been way much cooler than the combination of CPU and GPU.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •