Page 3 of 8 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 71

Thread: A First Look At The 2010 Linux Graphics Survey Results

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Linuxland
    Posts
    5,128

    Default

    Resorted to editing xorg.conf? Heck, I prefer doing it that way

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Perth, Scotland
    Posts
    438

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by curaga View Post
    Resorted to editing xorg.conf? Heck, I prefer doing it that way
    I suspect most people don't even need one anymore. I only need one to activate Zaphod mode.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    2,929

    Default

    Like I said before, I don't do ANYTHING to configure X. It works out of the box with free drivers, at native resolution, without needing anything.

    I don't have an xorg.conf and I don't use anything else.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Linuxland
    Posts
    5,128

    Default

    Well, I would only *need* it for setting my keyboard and some driver options, but I prefer to have it because explicit settings are always faster than any kind of autoscanning.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    351

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rohcQaH View Post
    you obviously haven't tried the evergreen 3d code yet

    ok, those should be classified as "beta".. still, stability is not an intrinsic property of open source software. It's just somewhat easier to achieve in the OSS gfx drivers due to reduced features, thus reduced code complexity.
    The LCD monitor on my file server freaks out when I boot up with nouveau. It complains about invalid video formats over and over and I can't get the messages to go away. When I use the nvidia driver it works just fine.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    1,630

    Default

    I really only use xorg.conf nowadays for enabling color tiling in radeon.

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Poland, Warsaw
    Posts
    73

    Default

    You didn't think thoroughly about resolution choices. Come on, today's laptops are often equipped with a 1440 x 900 screen - to which category would You qualify it, less than 1280 x 1024 or less than 1600 x 1200?

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    2,118

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rohcQaH View Post
    stability is not an intrinsic property of open source software.
    It actually is.
    Because of the infinite variation of packages, versions, and patchsets, something dynamic, like open source drivers, which can be adjusted to match the particular conditions, will naturally be more stable than a static blob that is designed for a much more rigid set of conditions.

    It's just somewhat easier to achieve in the OSS gfx drivers due to reduced features, thus reduced code complexity.
    Complexity of code isn't necessarily a reason for something to be unstable. More like the fact that all the blobs are just windoze drivers shoehorned into a totally incompatible system... and the dynamic nature of the operating system obviously, as mentioned above, needs a more dynamic driver.

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    2,118

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by frantaylor View Post
    The LCD monitor on my file server freaks out when I boot up with nouveau. It complains about invalid video formats over and over and I can't get the messages to go away. When I use the nvidia driver it works just fine.
    99.9% probable that your monitor is the unstable one in this equation. It is probably sending back a defective EDID. The blob driver may have an override for that particular monitor... which you are free to implement in the open source driver if you wish.

    Note: It is NOT the job of the driver to override defective input data, it is the job of the monitor to provide good information about its characteristics. If this weren't the case, then there would be no need to supply an EDID -- just manufacturer and model ID numbers.

    Here's how you can force a mode without having to hack the driver: http://nouveau.freedesktop.org/wiki/KernelModeSetting

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    2,118

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by m_gol View Post
    You didn't think thoroughly about resolution choices. Come on, today's laptops are often equipped with a 1440 x 900 screen - to which category would You qualify it, less than 1280 x 1024 or less than 1600 x 1200?
    In this case, I would actually multiply them all out and use a pixel count for figuring this out.

    1440x900=1296000
    1280x1024=1310720
    1600x1200=1920000

    So the 1440x900 would fit under the 1280x1024

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •