Page 1 of 8 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 75

Thread: There's Little Love For Ubuntu's Unity Desktop

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    15,138

    Default There's Little Love For Ubuntu's Unity Desktop

    Phoronix: There's Little Love For Ubuntu's Unity Desktop

    The announcement of Ubuntu dropping the GNOME shell in favor of their own Unity interface that came during Mark Shuttleworth's keynote to kick off their Ubuntu 11.04 development summit has not been welcomed by many Linux users...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=ODcxNg

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    158

    Default

    Wow, Ubuntu is falling even deeper into the realms of technical ineptitude, which I did not think was actually possible Fun !

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    575

    Default

    Kubuntu/kde4 forever.

  4. #4

    Default

    This suck's Phoronix, you're making Ubuntu look bad with this article. Most things i've read are good, yes there are lot's of people that actually think Ubuntu desktop edition will ship with the current UNE Unity. It's not.

    They are going to design a desktop edition using unity's technology. It will be faster since it won't use that crappy Mutter window manager, they'll use the latest Compiz packages.

    Gnome Shell = FAIL. I don't know anyone who likes it, not even the developers, that's why they are developing an Unity rip-off.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    2,264

    Default

    Just like Gnome shell; too much mouse movement and too small interface for touch screens. Hell give me a week and I'll come up with a design that's a million times better than that! (And not KDE, but something for usability idiots)

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    .ca
    Posts
    405

    Default

    Lets hope compiz won't be sucked up and screwed up by canonicl.

    With gnome going nowhere, and kde/kwin having become an overengineered tech demo, compiz is our last hope for a neat desktop experience.

  7. #7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by V!NCENT View Post
    Just like Gnome shell; too much mouse movement and too small interface for touch screens. Hell give me a week and I'll come up with a design that's a million times better than that! (And not KDE, but something for usability idiots)
    Since it's going to use Compiz and it's a desktop shell I'm pretty sure we will get lot's of keyboard shortcuts.

  8. #8

    Default

    It only took a few minutes to realize that the Unity Desktop is very much a disappointment for desktops
    I wasn't disappointed the last six months I used it on my desktop.

    If I had to choose between the already bloated and slow GNOME Shell and Unity, Unity would win with no doubt.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    271

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by virtualspectre8 View Post
    They are going to design a desktop edition using unity's technology. It will be faster since it won't use that crappy Mutter window manager, they'll use the latest Compiz packages.
    If they announced this change and haven't even begun to design the interface that will be launched in 6 months then this is an even bigger fail than it appeared to be initially.

    I was already planning on sitting on the LTS because they refuse to settle on any sort of base package selection (F-Spot anyone?), but this is probably enough to push me to Debian.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    26

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by V!NCENT View Post
    Just like Gnome shell; too much mouse movement and too small interface for touch screens. Hell give me a week and I'll come up with a design that's a million times better than that! (And not KDE, but something for usability idiots)
    It's not just mouse movement, it's the general idea of hiding all the open windows that is simply an invitation for pure chaos - and you will end up in no time scanning through a nicely displayed arrangement of 40 windows trying to figure out which one you actually wanted to open - and forgetting it in the process. Secondly, it's totally unconfigurable - I like gnome at present because I can set it up in no time if I happen to upgrade a distro and offers all the functionality I need in a transparent way, but with gnome-shell this tendency of removing configuration options is really going one step to far. If you want to keep your desktop in order *transparently*, then opt for something like awn has with the launchers which also act as "window-list" entries if that program is open, that way one automatically tends to use tabs instead of opening 10 or so firefox windows with one tab each just because one is used to click on the firefox launcher when looking up something. And with such an approach, you will seldom have more than a third of your "panel" space occupied.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •