Page 3 of 8 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 75

Thread: There's Little Love For Ubuntu's Unity Desktop

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    464

    Default

    I have always found Ubuntu's stock-desktop rather lacking. God forbid you should want to change the default look of the installation, you're required to install a ton of additional bits and use gnome-color-chooser. My thoughts on the announcement:

    1: Dropping gnome shell - Probably good, as Ubuntu's current implementation of the gnome shell is horrible. I'd prefer that they fix their implementation though.

    2: Adding compiz by default - This is good, as many of us do this anyway.

    3: Unity (based desktop experience) - While I want to see what they have to offer prior to passing judgment, unity (in its current form) is not something that I would choose to put on my PC.

    4: Required 3D acceleration - The technical term that comes to mind is "retarded". Even those of us with 3d accelerated hardware are periodically without acceleration.

    I'll probably take a peek at their plans this weekend, so that I have more information than what is provided by the "news-entertainment" websites.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    271

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by virtualspectre8 View Post
    What makes you think they haven't designed a UI? They might have some super secret UI for months now, it happened with Unity Netbook, it could be the case with unity desktop. I'm sure they have concepts and designs that will evolve during development.
    Mainly because you said:

    They are going to design a desktop edition using unity's technology.
    Which says that no design has occurred up to this point but by golly they'll get it done soon. God knows no other organization on this earth could slap together a usable UI in 6 months but Canonical will.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    The intarwebs
    Posts
    385

    Default

    I think it's fantastic. Global menu FTW

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    43

    Default

    So no one bothered to check that this was merely a blueprint for discussion at UDS, not any confirmation?

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    547

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by russofris View Post
    4: Required 3D acceleration - The technical term that comes to mind is "retarded". Even those of us with 3d accelerated hardware are periodically without acceleration.
    Are you sure about that? I would assume the desktop will default to something usable with no 3D accel.

    Anyways, I am not so surprised about this, and I really think a simple, consistent interface may be a good thing. Android did that: a simple API on top of the kernel, easy to write apps ... and it has exploded!

    I kind of wish for a simple interface where you can run GNOME apps, KDE apps, etc, and have them doc properly, etc.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    125

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by conorsulli View Post
    Its not the first time we have seen the gnome UI forked! Intel did it with Moblin.
    Neither Unity nor Moblin are GNOME forks. Get a clue before you act like a smart ass.

    Quote Originally Posted by conorsulli View Post
    At least this way Canonical can develop new technologies and not have them declined the whole time by the closed minded gnome model..
    Gosh, you are clueless...

    Quote Originally Posted by ModplanMan View Post
    So no one bothered to check that this was merely a blueprint for discussion at UDS, not any confirmation?
    http://arstechnica.com/open-source/n...buntu-1104.ars

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    125

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mendieta View Post
    Are you sure about that? I would assume the desktop will default to something usable with no 3D accel.
    Unity 11.04 will require accelerated OpenGL: http://njpatel.blogspot.com/2010/10/...ut-one-of.html

  8. #28

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by V!NCENT View Post
    Just like Gnome shell; too much mouse movement and too small interface for touch screens. Hell give me a week and I'll come up with a design that's a million times better than that! (And not KDE, but something for usability idiots)
    Okay.

    Here's a week.

    Go do it. Blog it, and submit the blog entry as a story to Phoronix. I'm sure they'll print it.

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    87

    Default

    The use of Compiz is a very welcome move. The ideas behind Unity are really good. Minimalistic interface and a search based app launcher, with most used apps easily accessible via a panel. The netbook edition unity is horribly slow and buggy, and who's to say that the desktop edition won't be buggy as well? but these are bugs that will hopefully will be fixed. People should judge it on the features it brings. Based on those, it's a good move.

    I only hope Canonical is a bit more open on their development. This is FOSS after all, not Apple/Microsoft. Show the community what and how you are planning to do things and you'll get the appropriate feedback. They had some mockups for unity when development started, which was good.

    my to cents

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    547

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KAMiKAZOW View Post
    Unity 11.04 will require accelerated OpenGL: http://njpatel.blogspot.com/2010/10/...ut-one-of.html

    Oh, thanks for the link! However, Ubuntu will NOT. From the post you referred to:

    So what happens when we detect that we just can't run? We hope to automatically fallback to GNOME Desktop, which will give the best experience at that point.
    Cheers!

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •