Anybody may confirm or deny this results? Or such performance is a normal for current linux drivers and gf 7300 ( because performance of the gfti4200 was identical in linux/windows )?
Hi all!
I have an asus a8j laptop with core 2 duo 1.66ghz and gf7300. Software
is ubuntu fiesty 7.04 x86-64 (linux 2.6.20) and nvidia drivers 9755. I tested
some opengl apps and wonder low framerate. I decided to compare linux vs
windows performance on my laptop. In windows i installed dx9 and nvidia
85.06 drivers (don't found newest version). Downloaded from
http://ioquake3.org/ windows and 64 bit linux version of quake3
binaries, also using the same pak0.pk3 file. Results:
Win2k: 640/normal - 480fps, 1024/allmax - 215fps
Linux: 640/normal - 320fps, 1024/allmax - 150fps
For exclude cpu i tested also compressing with lame 3.97:
Win2k - 24s. Linux - 26s.
Lame in windows is a little faster, but not 40%.
I tried:
1. Latest 2.6.21 kernel, whithout any drivers/modules, only that needed
too boot my system and launch ogl app.
2. Performance governon on cpu instead ondemand.
3. Cheking via nvidia-settings that gpu and mem frequency in 3d tasks
switching to 350/700.
4. 9631 nvidia drivers version.
5. Disabling composite extension.
Oh don't know what that may be, look like some kind of powersave
technology.
Also i found friends with asus laptops like my - asus lamborghini vx1
and w7j (gentoo/2.6.20/9755) - all have low framerate.
Anybody may confirm or deny this results? Or such performance is a normal for current linux drivers and gf 7300 ( because performance of the gfti4200 was identical in linux/windows )?
ubuntu and "only the necessary modules" doesn't go together :]ubuntu feisty 7.04 x86-64 (linux 2.6.20)
whithout any drivers/modules, only that needed
too boot my system and launch ogl app.
actually my friend bought himself an gf 7650 GT or something around 7x50 GT (don't remember too well) and he has very bad performance even on windows.