Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Intel Still Wants Xephyr, Willing To Maintain It

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    14,378

    Default Intel Still Wants Xephyr, Willing To Maintain It

    Phoronix: Intel Still Wants Xephyr, Willing To Maintain It

    Haitao Feng, a software engineer at Intel China believed to be working on MeeGo, has come forward seeking clarification on the future of Xephyr and KDrive. Intel is still interested in Xephyr and Haitao is willing to maintain it, especially after doing work to add OpenGL acceleration to this KDrive-based X Server that targets a host on another X Server as it's frame-buffer...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=ODc1NQ

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Perth, Scotland
    Posts
    435

    Default

    If someone does work on it, fix the bloody keymap issues!

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Berlin, Germany
    Posts
    821

    Default

    Keymap issues are mostly user configuration error. Such as still having xkbrules set to xorg.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Perth, Scotland
    Posts
    435

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by chithanh View Post
    Keymap issues are mostly user configuration error. Such as still having xkbrules set to xorg.
    I'm not an expert on XKB but I think I've seen this confirmed as a bug somewhere. My usual layout is xkblayout="gb" xkbvariant="dvorak" xkboptions="compose:menu" and this is set with udev. When I usually run Xephyr, regardless of what options I set, my layout is complete gibberish. It only works at all on very rare and random occasions. I have tried -keybd ephyr,,xkbmodel=evdev, and when it doesn't give me gibberish, it just gives me qwerty rather than dvorak. I have also tried -keybd ephyr,,xkbmodel=evdev,xkblayout=gb,xkbvariant=dvor ak, but I can't remember if this has ever worked. I can only get gibberish at the moment.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Berlin, Germany
    Posts
    821

    Default

    Code:
    Xephyr :1 -keybd ephyr,,xkbrules=evdev,xkbmodel=evdev,xkblayout=gb,xkbvariant=dvorak
    appears to work correctly here. Only if I omit xkbrules it acts a bit funny. This is on Xorg 1.9.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Perth, Scotland
    Posts
    435

    Default

    And that did the trick. Thank you! Working here on 1.8.2.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Vermont
    Posts
    99

    Default

    I haven't actually started checking this out yet, but I believe Xephyr may offer a significant advantage for me.

    I have to support some old technologies, in addition to the new fun stuff. I don't do the old stuff every day, but every now and then I have to fire up the old tools to go with the old technologies. One of those tools just plain doesn't like X compositing. For now I've got compositing turned off in /etc/X11/xorg.conf, but I'm sure I won't want to run that way forever, as stuff like compiz becomes more standard, and using the legacy tools becomes less frequent.

    I've wondered if Xephyr could do something for me here, allow me to run compositing on my desktop, but turn it off in Xephyr, and run the legacy tools there. The man page doesn't indicate that I can, but the man page is pretty darned sparse, and somehow I doubt it's complete.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •