Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 38

Thread: AMD Already Has Open-Source Fusion Drivers

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    458

    Default

    gain presence on Fusion operating systems.
    Surely you meant to say "gain presence on Fusion hardware"--unless there is a Fusion operating system I was unaware of.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    231

    Default

    I really can't wait to hear if these drivers support Gallium3D, and to what degree.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Toronto-ish
    Posts
    7,514

    Default

    I don't think we have tried the Ontario parts with the Gallium3D driver but it should pretty much work the same as any other Evergreen part once the changes are ported across from r600 to r600g.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Linuxland
    Posts
    5,180

    Default

    Considering both AMD and Intel have FOSS drivers, but Intel actually has plans for dedicated unit hw video accel (while AMD has plans not to)..

    It's of course theoretical until either happens, IIRC Intel doesn't have vaapi support for the Atom gpu yet.

    @bridgman: are the 80 shaders enough for high-level H.264? For the supposed shader accel.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    3,173

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by curaga View Post
    @bridgman: are the 80 shaders enough for high-level H.264? For the supposed shader accel.
    The low end parts are running the GPU shaders at half the speed of the higher end model that everyone has been testing so far. I'd say there's no way that one has enough power, although the full speed parts might.

    UVD support is looking like the major missing puzzle piece from AMD right now. I don't see how they expect to contend with Ion without it, since these CPUs are exactly the ones which would benefit the most - although maybe they just view the Linux HTPC market as too small to worry about.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Paris
    Posts
    432

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by smitty3268 View Post
    UVD support is looking like the major missing puzzle piece from AMD right now. I don't see how they expect to contend with Ion without it, since these CPUs are exactly the ones which would benefit the most - although maybe they just view the Linux HTPC market as too small to worry about.
    Supporting both MeeGo and the "Vision" brand without a correct and decent driver for HW video decoding is not going to be very appealing among users and possible clustomers. That's a sure thing... What a deception.

    BTW, ION is a dead end. Who wants a 18W GPU where you can get AMD or Intel CPU+GPU solution within the same thermal enveloppe? Besides, the Intel Ironlake performance is on par with ION. Likewise for the Fusion parts, I'd guess.

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    2,264

    Default

    Interesting... On the AMD Fusion website it shows that Fuseion has a UVD?

    Spoken language != writen language. The written language is standardized, but greatly influenced by the spoken language, which is defined by the times

    Language standardization is never done/completed. It's a continues process.

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    2,122

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by curaga View Post
    Considering both AMD and Intel have FOSS drivers, but Intel actually has plans for dedicated unit hw video accel (while AMD has plans not to)..

    It's of course theoretical until either happens, IIRC Intel doesn't have vaapi support for the Atom gpu yet.
    That all depends on what you're referring to when you talk about intel gpus.... you referring to intel atom, how about intel atom Z -- your statements about intel are reversed with respect to atom Z, which does NOT have open source driver, but DOES have vaapi.

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Linuxland
    Posts
    5,180

    Default

    I'm thinking of the Intel-designed gpus. After all, the Ontario is not competing against Atom Z.

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    3,173

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by V!NCENT View Post
    Interesting... On the AMD Fusion website it shows that Fuseion has a UVD?
    It has UVD3, the same version that the new 6xxx series has. The problem is that they don't support using it under Linux, even with their proprietary fglrx driver. Especially not with the OSS ones.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •