Page 1 of 7 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 65

Thread: AMD Catalyst 10.11 Linux Driver Released

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    14,643

    Default AMD Catalyst 10.11 Linux Driver Released

    Phoronix: AMD Catalyst 10.11 Linux Driver Released

    As was pointed out in our forums, the AMD Catalyst 10.11 Linux driver has tipped up today. This driver, with its installer package approaching 120MB in size, is now available for download at AMD's web-site...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=ODc5NQ

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    40

    Default

    Wow!!! it is a 20% fatter than previous 10.10... I hope it brings something new!

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    519

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by elmo23x View Post
    Wow!!! it is a 20% fatter than previous 10.10... I hope it brings something new!
    Erm well... Better 6x00 support and Fusion?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    131

    Default

    No unminimize delay
    Blur works (except Mipmap)
    Video vsync still doesn't work

    I give it about 5 more years and it will be fine.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    67

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by unimatrix View Post
    No unminimize delay
    Blur works (except Mipmap)
    Video vsync still doesn't work

    I give it about 5 more years and it will be fine.
    That's what they were saying 5 years ago.

  6. #6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Decatf View Post
    That's what they were saying 5 years ago.
    HAHA. So true. I bought a Radeon 4870 after phoronix blabbed about great open source drivers. I sold it 2 months later, because both open/closed drivers suck.
    I'm happy with my nvidia now. Even though the drivers are closed source, they WORK. Imagine that! No screen tearing, crashes, and hardware acceleration.

    Also of note, I swear that 90% of the times phoronix posts about a new Radeon drive the headline is 'nothing interesting'
    Seriously ATI, excuse me, I meant AMD, if you want my business stop talking about roadmaps, and future improvements, and just release something that competes with nvidia TODAY

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    264

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SyXbiT View Post
    HAHA. So true. I bought a Radeon 4870 after phoronix blabbed about great open source drivers. I sold it 2 months later, because both open/closed drivers suck.
    I'm happy with my nvidia now. Even though the drivers are closed source, they WORK. Imagine that! No screen tearing, crashes, and hardware acceleration.

    Also of note, I swear that 90% of the times phoronix posts about a new Radeon drive the headline is 'nothing interesting'
    Seriously ATI, excuse me, I meant AMD, if you want my business stop talking about roadmaps, and future improvements, and just release something that competes with nvidia TODAY
    stop writing bullshit.

    I owned a HD4870 until half a year ago and it worked fine. No problems with 3D games like Heroes of Newerth, Vendetta Online, ET:QW and Regnum Online, in fact most of those games ran even faster than on a similar system with windows vista. I now own a Radeon HD5870 and it's just awesome! Unigine, HoN, UrbanTerror, RegnumOnline, Vendetta Online ...everything runs perfect and I never experienced a crash with one of those cards/drivers and I sure do alot of stuff with them (compiz, gaming, videos...). oh and btw. if you use the open source driver it's your own fault...I mean, come on, you can't even configure them without crashing your xserver

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    131

    Default

    Been thinking about selling my 4870 too. Damn you Phoronix for making me think the opensource drivers were any good.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    10

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Detructor View Post
    if you use the open source driver it's your own fault...I mean, come on, you can't even configure them without crashing your xserver
    To quote someone, don't know who, "stop writing bullshit." I've been using the Gallium3D driver for my 4200 IGP for about three months now, and classic mesa for quite a while before that, and experienced less crashes than with the binary blob, in fact the worst I've had recently is a couple of soft lockups that the OSS driver handles without crashing anything not to mention, there's nothing needs configuring. Apart from some optimisation issues it's a better quality driver.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    2

    Smile

    Had a HD4850, which worked great with my open source drivers. I don't play games in Linux though. Just bought a HD6870 a few days ago, which didnt work under X. I kept my HD4850 running while waiting for the ATI 10.11 release, and just now installed both the new release and my new card. Works like a charm ( dual screen setup ). The only annoying thing for now is the "AMD Unsupported hardware" watermark in the lower right corners of my screens But I can live with those for another month or so

    With a bit of luck, when Ubuntu 11.04 hits the streets, the open source driver will have support for the HD6xxx cards, and all will be fine

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •