Page 3 of 9 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 81

Thread: Ubuntu To Turn Into A Rolling-Release Distribution?

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    34

    Default Binary distros with rolling releases

    There are atleast two well known and regarded binary distributions with rolling releases: Arch and Slackware.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    52

    Default

    Yey, this is what I always wanted! Won't need 20 ppa's anymore. :-)

    Still this should be combined with some kind of LTS platform every now and then.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    341

    Default

    mixed feeling about rolling edition

    you want wayland.. without automated help, its impossible to make it work good

    maybe rolling edition fork? or set in update center? not forcing to use one of this two

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    86

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by crazycheese View Post
    Imagine Glibc is upgraded and you have 1000 packages currently installed in your system. A lot of packages from the tree must be rebuilt or will break with segfaults!
    So how come I don't have to re-download those 1000 packages whenever there's a bugfix release to Glibc?

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    486

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JeanPaul145 View Post
    And yes I'm aware that strictly speaking, there is support for a nice ol' sudo aptitude update && sudo aptitude full-upgrade but I've seen it go wrong too many times on Kubuntu to trust that process for updating to a new Kubuntu release.
    Works here (not even from the command line, but from the upgrade GUI) most of the time. This is in 2 netbooks, a desktop and a laptop, all at home. I only had issues ocassionally, once with the ATI binary drivers not working after the upgrade, and recently with a grub bug whereas it wrote to the wrong partition. In both cases I fixed it, but a newbie would have been stuck. So, the success rate has been really high

    It would still be great to have a way to only keep apps up to date, assuming your kernel/graphics stack all do what you need.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    114

    Default

    This would be really great.
    Anyone who has used Arch linux without the Test repo knows that it easily as stable as Ubuntu.

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    334

    Default

    I think there are some plans already to offer updated versions of important desktop applications (say, Firefox or OpenOffice) mid-release. This is a very useful decis, but only if the basis of the distribution is left unchanged as much as possible. IMO a full, system-wide rolling release is in general a bad idea.

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    2,264

    Default

    Heh, Canonical|Mark is playing Microsoft
    http://www.roughlydrafted.com/RD/Q4....473899D7D.html

    They will win some more marketshare with this. This is the sole reason Microsoft ever came to dominance, but I doubt it will work for Ubuntu...

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    334

    Default

    This is a very useful decis
    Decision. Screw that one minute limit.

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    1,946

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by chaos386 View Post
    So how come I don't have to re-download those 1000 packages whenever there's a bugfix release to Glibc?
    It depends on case. Sometimes its just changes to the code, sometimes changes to compile or link logic. Most of the time its not required, yet most of the time minor versions are not kept in gentoo as well.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •