Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 27

Thread: Unity Desktop Possibly Coming To Fedora

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    233

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by phoronix View Post
    Phoronix: Unity Desktop Possibly Coming To Fedora
    It is only going to be packaged, it is not going to be in the default install. The title is a bit sensationalist.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    .ca
    Posts
    400

    Default

    What's with all the re-inventions of panels, desktop icons and applets, OSD notification, etc anyway?

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    2,117

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by not.sure View Post
    What's with all the re-inventions of panels, desktop icons and applets, OSD notification, etc anyway?
    Clean up the mess, ready it for 2010 usage. Nothing wrong with that, actually Ubuntu is doing great stuff.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    2,926

    Default

    Actually, I don't think that this fragmentation is going to do any good to GNOME. It would be better for the project if they got GNOME Shell working and working well, and then present a standardised, sane, stable desktop to compete with KDE.

    There is a danger that soon the only thing different GNOME installations have in common is GTK.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    2,117

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pingufunkybeat View Post
    Actually, I don't think that this fragmentation is going to do any good to GNOME. It would be better for the project if they got GNOME Shell working and working well, and then present a standardised, sane, stable desktop to compete with KDE.

    There is a danger that soon the only thing different GNOME installations have in common is GTK.
    I think both Unity and Gnome Shell are doing great. And I also think that within a year or two after the first stable releases in around April 2011, we will probably see a favourite out of the two that people will concentrate on so don't worry.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    125

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by d2kx View Post
    a favourite out of the two that people will concentrate on so don't worry.
    Why would anybody out of the community be willing to assign his/her copyright to Canonical?

    Also Canonical dictates usability decisions. They already announced that Unity's Dock won't be movable because they want it to be "always close to the Ubuntu button". http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2010/12/u...t-be-moveable/

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    1,111

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by madjr View Post
    i wonder if the ubuntu guys really want their new interface appearing everywhere...
    Sure they do. It's free promotion. If a commercial vendor happens to like Unity, he has to go to Canonical anyway because due the copyright assignment Canonical can relicense a proprietary version of Unity.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Under the bridge
    Posts
    2,126

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KAMiKAZOW View Post
    Why would anybody out of the community be willing to assign his/her copyright to Canonical?
    Why not?

    The FSF also requires copyright assignment, as does Novell, as do many other open-source companies. People who disagree are free to not contribute code.

    Also Canonical dictates usability decisions. They already announced that Unity's Dock won't be movable because they want it to be "always close to the Ubuntu button". http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2010/12/u...t-be-moveable/
    Which is exactly like Gnome Shell, where the panel is not movable. Oy vey.

    The difference is that Canonical has hired usability experts to work on Unity, whereas Gnome Shell treats usability as something to be done in hackfests. Which is why Gnome Shell is such a nightmare to use.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    24

    Default

    Don't get why people say that about gnome3, been using it for ages now and really really like it. Only changes i really want are more customization options, applets etc

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    984

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Iksf View Post
    Don't get why people say that about gnome3, been using it for ages now and really really like it. Only changes i really want are more customization options, applets etc
    Well, I tried alpha versions of both Ubuntu 11.04 with Unity and Fedora 15 with gnome-shell. And I must say I've found gnome-shell to not only give a better user experience than Unity but it also has a much better look than Unity. And I'm certainly not the only Ubuntu user who is not pleased with the Unity experience. I think the Canonical "usability experts" really screwed things up with Unity.

    Having said that, gnome-shell looks nice but I don't think it's ready yet. Like you said it really needs applets and more customization options, and there are also some graphic driver issues with gnome-shell.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •