Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 25

Thread: NVIDIA Comments On Its Linux Driver Architectue

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    110

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by V!NCENT View Post
    kk
    The binary determines the speed of the graphics card. The optimizations is something that gives vendors a competative edge. Neither nVidia nor AMD would like to see it open on the streets.
    Yeah, but that "edge" is totally moot if that means you have to jump thru loops just to get the binary driver to work...
    ...or wait months to be able to use the latest version of a distribution because the binary provider fails to deliver a driver for the updated APIs/ABIs...
    ...or not being able to suspend your laptop without it crashing...

    Yeah, it is a edge on a system while you are playing or doing a specific task, but if the driver does not handle "daily usage", that edge is still moot.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Poland
    Posts
    119

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Xake View Post
    Oh, a bit of trolling, ey?
    Or are you just saying that a joint project between those companies are just as likely as the reintroduction of those two political elements into the western somewhat broken liberal capitalism?
    Merging companies just to cut costs and time and leaving no choice but one's company products is communistic/socialistic/fascistic move which kills competitiveness.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    110

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by NSLW View Post
    Merging companies just to cut costs and time and leaving no choice but one's company products is communistic/socialistic/fascistic move which kills competitiveness.
    Oh, my. You really do not know your politics, ey?
    So when AMD merged with ATI to cut costs and time, they where pro-violent-regime (i.e. fascistic)?

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Have a good day.
    Posts
    678

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by NSLW View Post
    Merging companies just to cut costs and time and leaving no choice but one's company products is communistic/socialistic/fascistic move which kills competitiveness.
    And puppies. Don't forget about puppies.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    3,798

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Xake View Post
    Yeah, but that "edge" is totally moot if that means you have to jump thru loops just to get the binary driver to work...
    ...or wait months to be able to use the latest version of a distribution because the binary provider fails to deliver a driver for the updated APIs/ABIs...
    ...or not being able to suspend your laptop without it crashing...

    Yeah, it is a edge on a system while you are playing or doing a specific task, but if the driver does not handle "daily usage", that edge is still moot.
    It's not moot, since the main target is Windows. Suspend and daily usage works excellent there.

    Oh, you meant on Linux. Yeah, but who uses that. It's not even friendly to binary drivers. <grin>

  6. #16
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Third Rock from the Sun
    Posts
    6,584

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by droidhacker View Post
    They're looking to hire... time to send in the spys, to capture all their IP and release it for free on the internet

    ** then you poor nvidia users can finally have a decent driver.
    I'll be sure to tell my hardware that.

    "STOP WORKING AS ADVERTISED AND EXPECTED DAMMIT! PLEASE USE THESE OPENSOURCE DRIVERS AND SLOW DOWN!!! I WANT LESS PERFORMANCE PER WATT, FEWER FEATURES, AND NEUTERED DESKTOP EXPERIENCE! WHY ELSE DO YOU THINK I COMPILE MY KERNELS i386! I DON'T WANT NO OPTIMIZATIONS! F*CK SSE SUPPORT AND THE LIKES!"

  7. #17
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Third Rock from the Sun
    Posts
    6,584

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Xake View Post
    Yeah, but that "edge" is totally moot if that means you have to jump thru loops just to get the binary driver to work...
    ...or wait months to be able to use the latest version of a distribution because the binary provider fails to deliver a driver for the updated APIs/ABIs...
    Actually it's the opensource drivers that have been typically behind in supporting updated API/ABI. Just look at openCL, openGL, etc for good examples.

    ...or not being able to suspend your laptop without it crashing...
    NV blobs are working fine here for that.


    Yeah, it is a edge on a system while you are playing or doing a specific task, but if the driver does not handle "daily usage", that edge is still moot.
    I use blobs for daily usage every day and they work fine.

    PS the phase is "Jump through hoops"

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Poland
    Posts
    119

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Xake View Post
    Oh, my. You really do not know your politics, ey?
    So when AMD merged with ATI to cut costs and time, they where pro-violent-regime (i.e. fascistic)?
    It seems like you don't get it. I wont reply to trolling.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    3,046

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by elanthis View Post
    They don't need huge teams. The drivers are the same between Windows and Linux, it's just a small bit of OS-specific code to handle. The "Windows team" for the driver development includes all the OS-specific stuff plus the core driver. Plus the DirectX support that Linux lacks.
    In truth, there is a minimal difference between "DirectX Support" and OpenGL support. Most of the functionalities are supplied via ARB extensions either as or before the next Direct3D version ships.

    By the way, there IS something to the remarks they made- just so you know. If you don't have enough people to fix the code core between OSes and APIs, you're not going to have as quality a result- regardless of the OS layer code being a small precentage. (We won't get into the fact that oftentimes it's that "small" code piece that's the source of the problems...)

    If they were so poor, why is it that two of the three "Next Gen" consoles are powered by AMD's silicon on the GPU side of things? It's not cost that motivated that.

    Those OSes are unsupported by any modern GPU.

    No kidding.

    It is, actually. Look how much people are clamoring for OpenGL 4 on Linux. The new APIs are better, more powerful, and developers actually want to use them. I am very much waiting for OpenGL 3 on the Linux FOSS drivers, in fact.
    Indeed.

    This makes no sense. They work on totally separate drivers for totally different hardware. The proprietary drivers are closed for business reasons and not a lack of manpower reason.
    Yes, they're closed for a business reason. The variable quality? That's mostly a manpower reason, coupled with some worldview issues at one of the companies in question.

    So far as the open drivers, NVIDIA doesn't even have a team doing those. Nouveau is all hobbyist/volunteer work, unlike the AMD driver.
    NVidia doesn't have anyone working on FOSS drivers. AMD doesn't have a team dedicated to the FOSS drivers- they're helping, but it's the community, from my understanding, that's doing the work on that one.

    Yes, AMD could put more people on the FOSS driver, but there's a business decision to be made there. They aren't making any significant extra income by having a FOSS driver. Hence, there's no reason to put more money into it. And I don't blame them for that; if there were a large enough number of desktop Linux users who actually demanded FOSS drivers, the market pressure would change. As is, there are a small number of desktop Linux users and most of them are either happy with weak drivers (or just weak hardware *cough* Intel *cough*) or are happy with proprietary drivers.
    In truth, I wish they'd put more effort into their drivers in general- FOSS would be perfect, but I'll accept better results with their closed drivers while the FOSS drivers gel. You indicate that they're not making significant money with the FOSS story, but that's more a chicken and egg problem. Need the drivers to have a demand for them...and there's going to be a bit more Linux in the future for us.

    As opposed to the FOSS community which has hundreds of thousands (if not millions) of developers... and yet there still is a tiny handful of graphics stack developers. Number of employees is irrelevant; number of skilled, experienced, motivated developers is what matters. I'm willing to bet NVIDIA has AMD trounced in this area, comparing the relative quality of their proprietary drivers (on any OS).
    Ah...there you go. You've hit upon the real issue. Somewhere along the line before AMD bought ATI, ATI had slashed it's staffing considerably to try to survive when the downturn from the 2000/2001 bubble burst impacted the PC industry and their sales suffered. They weren't back at the "good" staffing levels when AMD bought them- and it'll take a bit of time yet to get it back up there as they've got to get justification for the people and then find them.

    While AMD has some of the best and brightest working for them, they don't have enough of them right at the moment and it's...difficult...to find good people that can do the work and it takes quite a bit of learning curve to honestly get some of what needs to be known to be able to work on modern GPUs (Which is why we're seeing slow, steady progress from the FOSS drivers- even if we want and need them to be progressing a bit quicker...)

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    110

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by deanjo View Post
    Actually it's the opensource drivers that have been typically behind in supporting updated API/ABI. Just look at openCL, openGL, etc for good examples.
    Well that is one kind of API, but you also got that "new kernel version" or "new Xorg version" kinds of API/ABI...

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •