Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 18 of 18

Thread: Cannot reinstall grub on laptop's new disk - HELP!

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    24

    Default

    Does GRUB Support EXT4 now?

    Is there a new Stage3 for that? (or is EXT4 backwards compatible enough for the EXT3 stage3 to work?)

    Personally I would NOT trust a near-experimental Filesystem to boot from.

    Whats wrong with a small EXT2 only '/boot' partition?

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    6,607

    Default

    Use grub 2 - grub 1 is dead.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    429

    Default grub supports ext4 just fine

    Quote Originally Posted by Melchior View Post
    Does GRUB Support EXT4 now?
    Yes. And it is all working fine.

    Personally I would NOT trust a near-experimental Filesystem to boot from.
    It's not experimental any more, either.

    Whats wrong with a small EXT2 only '/boot' partition?
    Apart from the kernel developers wanting to remove the ext2 and ext3 legacy filesystems? Apparently, ext4's backwards compatibility with existing ext2 and ext3 partitions is thought to be enough, which makes the original ext2 and ext3 modules an overhead of code maintenance.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    429

    Default I'll use whichever grub ships with Fedora

    Quote Originally Posted by Kano View Post
    Use grub 2 - grub 1 is dead.
    Trying to do anything else would be madness.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Have a good day.
    Posts
    678

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kano
    Use grub 2 - grub 1 is dead.
    My interest in following the development of stuff that I don't feel needs replacement (or I simply ignore the reasons behind the changes) is basically zero. That's why I've no idea about this GRUB 2 thing.

    I'm on Debian running grub-legacy; is there any reason to upgrade to grub 2? If yes, should I be aware of something before doing it?

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    6,607

    Default

    Debian 6 uses definitely Grub 2 by default (on x86/x64: package: grub-pc). It is much more powerful than the older Grub 1. Red Hat is using Grub 1 patched for ext4 - the needed patch was available since years but basically why should somebody still use the legacy version? You officially do not get any support for it.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Have a good day.
    Posts
    678

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kano
    Debian 6 uses definitely Grub 2 by default (on x86/x64: package: grub-pc). It is much more powerful than the older Grub 1. Red Hat is using Grub 1 patched for ext4 - the needed patch was available since years but basically why should somebody still use the legacy version? You officially do not get any support for it.
    Well, I use Grub-legacy because...well, because it boots my system just fine. I don't need support for ext4 nor anything fancy. Anyway, I take it that there are no problems nor nasty little surprises with upgrading to Grub 2, yes? This is, I expect that it won't demand my attention like, at all, if I install the new version...

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    878

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kano View Post
    Debian 6 uses definitely Grub 2 by default (on x86/x64: package: grub-pc). It is much more powerful than the older Grub 1. Red Hat is using Grub 1 patched for ext4 - the needed patch was available since years but basically why should somebody still use the legacy version? You officially do not get any support for it.
    Did Debian bother updating grub 2 to a version that isn't overwritten by certain windows programs?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •