Page 1 of 6 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 55

Thread: Linux Gaming: Native vs. Wine vs. Windows 7 Performance

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    14,318

    Default Linux Gaming: Native vs. Wine vs. Windows 7 Performance

    Phoronix: Linux Gaming: Native vs. Wine vs. Windows 7 Performance

    Linux gaming has a bright future ahead with the forthcoming Unigine games, successful indie campaigns, and many other Linux-native game titles being just out on the horizon. Right now though if you are a dedicated PC gamer looking to satisfy your entertainment appetite under Linux, more than likely you find yourself using the Wine program so that you can run many Windows programs under Linux. What is the performance impact though of using this method? In this article, we have a couple benchmarks comparing the performance of Wine, native Linux game binaries, and the native Microsoft Windows 7 Professional performance.

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=15567

  2. #2

    Default

    Michael, before you start testing "Direct3D-rendered games" and draw any conclusions about WinAPP[Direct3D] -> Wine -> Linux[OpenGL], please, remember that Wine's DirectX implementation may be incomplete.

    Thus the same game may run faster under Linux/Wine than it runs natively only because Wine doesn't completely pass through all DirectX calls into OpenGL calls.

    So, IMO such an article just ... doesn't make any sense at all - unless you also compare graphics quality (pixel by pixel).

  3. #3

    Default

    With Urban Terror, the Ubuntu Linux performance again came out ahead of Windows 7.
    Your graph shows WIndows 7 being faster at Urban Terror, not Ubuntu.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    5

    Thumbs down

    Testing games that are natively available for Linux does not make much sense in my opinion, as nobody is interested in running them with Wine. What about comparing games from the Wine Platinum and Gold top lists? http://appdb.winehq.org/

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Linuxland
    Posts
    4,987

    Default

    One conclusion is that Wine 1.3.9 is consistently slower than 1.2.1. I wonder if the Wine project would appreciate a fps regression bisect.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    233

    Default

    Interesting.
    Could you also test an AMD gfx with the proprietary driver?
    Could you also add the CPU usage?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    1

    Default

    How do you do to make the UrbanTerror exceed 125 fps, which is the limit of the game engine?
    You measure fps much higher than 125 fps, how? using a modified version of the game?

  8. #8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Chol View Post
    Testing games that are natively available for Linux does not make much sense in my opinion, as nobody is interested in running them with Wine. What about comparing games from the Wine Platinum and Gold top lists? http://appdb.winehq.org/
    Read the article... it's explained.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    343

    Default

    nice test, want more

  10. #10

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by photon View Post
    How do you do to make the UrbanTerror exceed 125 fps, which is the limit of the game engine?
    You measure fps much higher than 125 fps, how? using a modified version of the game?
    Run the Phoronix Test Suite.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •