Page 1 of 10 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 95

Thread: KDE SC 4.6 Release Candidate 1 Makes It Out

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    13,410

    Default KDE SC 4.6 Release Candidate 1 Makes It Out

    Phoronix: KDE SC 4.6 Release Candidate 1 Makes It Out

    As a Christmas present for KDE users around the world, the first release candidate for KDE Software Compilation 4.6 has emerged this morning. After being in beta for about one month's time, the developers have issued the first of two release candidates. The final release of KDE 4.6 is meanwhile scheduled to take place on the 27th of January...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=ODk1MA

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    351

    Default

    Yeah, just like with 4.5, pim was supposed to come with a 4.5.x release and it never came. It is possible this will happen again, and it will be postponed for 4.7...

  3. #3

    Default

    I hope it never comes. If it comes, then I will no longer be able to avoid installing nepomuk and akonadi with KDE.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    111

    Default

    You don't need nepomuk for akonadi.

    In any case I'd prefer if the pim-team simply said "When it's done".

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Under the bridge
    Posts
    2,099

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mat69 View Post
    You don't need nepomuk for akonadi.
    This sentence is surreal.

    As for KDE 4.6, I wish KWin would somehow double in performance. Kwin is the greatest stumbling block when moving from Gnome/Compiz to KDE: with the former, Opera, Firefox and Chrome scroll 100% smoothly (85fps on my monitor). With the latter, all three browsers fall to half or one third that rate and feel awful.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    2,908

    Default

    Why not use KDE + compiz?

    Compiz is not in any way dependent on GNOME. I used to run it with KDE, but eventually switched to KWin because it's a much better WM and the performance didn't bother me much.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    944

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TemplarGR View Post
    Yeah, just like with 4.5, pim was supposed to come with a 4.5.x release and it never came. It is possible this will happen again, and it will be postponed for 4.7...
    I sure hope this time they mean it. I can't stand kmail's limitations and bugs anymore, although I'm not sure these will get solved with kmail2.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    113

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pingufunkybeat View Post
    Why not use KDE + compiz?

    Compiz is not in any way dependent on GNOME. I used to run it with KDE, but eventually switched to KWin because it's a much better WM and the performance didn't bother me much.
    Because KWin is way better - even the cube has better quality graphics.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Have a good day.
    Posts
    678

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BlackStar View Post
    As for KDE 4.6, I wish KWin would somehow double in performance. Kwin is the greatest stumbling block when moving from Gnome/Compiz to KDE: with the former, Opera, Firefox and Chrome scroll 100% smoothly (85fps on my monitor). With the latter, all three browsers fall to half or one third that rate and feel awful.
    A tenfold performance increase would be more like it. I'm not kidding, that's the magnitude of the difference I observed between several gtkperf tests under Kwin and Compiz.

    Quote Originally Posted by pingufunkybeat
    Why not use KDE + compiz?

    Compiz is not in any way dependent on GNOME. I used to run it with KDE, but eventually switched to KWin because it's a much better WM and the performance didn't bother me much.
    Because it's suboptimal. Maybe not so much for somebody used to Compiz, but as you said, Kwin is ahead in terms of, duh, window management. I don't think Compiz integration in KDE is superb either.

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr. James
    Because KWin is way better - even the cube has better quality graphics.
    Hang on. I agree Kwin is a better WM, and the effects have a more subtle and professional touch. The downside is that it performs badly, and I don't think the graphics quality is any better--particularly the cube.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    167

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BlackStar View Post
    This sentence is surreal.

    As for KDE 4.6, I wish KWin would somehow double in performance. Kwin is the greatest stumbling block when moving from Gnome/Compiz to KDE: with the former, Opera, Firefox and Chrome scroll 100% smoothly (85fps on my monitor). With the latter, all three browsers fall to half or one third that rate and feel awful.
    Out of curiosity which graphics drivers are you using. The key difference I am aware of with kwin is that it requires some new features than compiz which some drivers don't do overly well.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •