Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 22 of 22

Thread: Benchmarks Of The Btrfs Space Cache Option

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    418

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LavosPhoenix View Post
    My only problem with btrfs is the lack of a fsck tool that actually corrects errors, otherwise btrfs was working great until something went wrong and I couldn't correct errors in it. However, does space_cache deal with the huge about of "wasted space" that a btrfs system has?
    What? ZFS does not have any "fsck" tool, it need not by design. I think it is the same with BTRFS, it need no "fsck"?

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    69

    Default

    Testing compression on syntethic tests is ... stupid. All this tools basically write simple patterns to files which can be easly compressed.

    Please do something more real world, like uncompressing kernel.tar.gz, or buliding kernel, or replaying real world file system operations (search for replayfs and tracefs tools).

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •