Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 37

Thread: VIA Launches A Graphics Card. Will It Work With Linux?

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    13

    Default

    BTw Linux support is mentioned:

    http://resources.e-itx.com/via-eH1/UM_VIA-eH1_060.pdf

    Whether or not in practice is up for testing.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    in front of my box :p
    Posts
    841

    Default

    You are really spending your money on such an uncertain thing? Well, that is either courageous or ... well, foolish

    Indeed the manual says something about
    "Operating System: Windows XP, Windows 7 and Linux" but reading shows limited Windows support (Vista not mentioned, not that Vista would be good for anything...), no BluRay for XP and Linux was mentioned with x86 (so probably no amd64 support).
    99,9 % of the pages show Windows procedures and problems. "Linux" is just mentioned 2 times without any further hint. X.org or something not at all.
    It's your money, I wish you luck but I am sure that you'll find out the many issues soon.

    And I wouldn't spend any money on VIA anymore. Just had years of pain with their stuff (well, mainly the GPU side, the rest was so-so) I'll stay away from them.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Under the bridge
    Posts
    2,153

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Fatfool View Post
    I will PERSONALLY get 2 of them, one for Windows HTPC usage and the other to stick into a minix 780G running Ubuntu and see if the card's driver issues throttle me. Wish me luck.
    If you are happy with one driver update per 12 months, don't upgrade your distro ever and don't care about 3d graphics then why not? Please blog/post about your experience, it will help others make more informed decisions - one way or another.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    271

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DeepDayze View Post
    Via's chips are definitely horrible under Windows and not just Linux (think their old MVP chipsets) It's all just cheap, weak hardware not really worth bothering with.
    MVP? Well, if that's the time scale let's start talking about the i810, i820, AMD-750 and 761, and the NForce 4.

    Via has had plenty of decent chipsets. They've had their share of horrid ones, like every other manufacturer.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Under the bridge
    Posts
    2,153

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by locovaca View Post
    MVP? Well, if that's the time scale let's start talking about the i810, i820, AMD-750 and 761, and the NForce 4.

    Via has had plenty of decent chipsets. They've had their share of horrid ones, like every other manufacturer.
    Nforce 4 is fine, still rocking on my Linux server-o-box. Not as good as Nforce 2, maybe, (SoundStorm!) but solid nonetheless.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    271

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BlackStar View Post
    Nforce 4 is fine, still rocking on my Linux server-o-box. Not as good as Nforce 2, maybe, (SoundStorm!) but solid nonetheless.
    Probably not bad as a server but the PCI latency issues make it fairly craptacular for anything that uses audio.

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Connecticut,USA
    Posts
    983

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by locovaca View Post
    MVP? Well, if that's the time scale let's start talking about the i810, i820, AMD-750 and 761, and the NForce 4.

    Via has had plenty of decent chipsets. They've had their share of horrid ones, like every other manufacturer.
    I gave the MVP chips as an example of one of their most horrid chipsets ever made (way back around 2000-2001)

    Their most recent chipsets are a mixed bag though

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    271

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DeepDayze View Post
    I gave the MVP chips as an example of one of their most horrid chipsets ever made (way back around 2000-2001)

    Their most recent chipsets are a mixed bag though
    Right, that's my point. MVP were actually 90's, Socket 7 stuff. No point in crucifying companies for decisions they made 6 generations ago. At least, on the chipset front.

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Under the bridge
    Posts
    2,153

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by locovaca View Post
    Probably not bad as a server but the PCI latency issues make it fairly craptacular for anything that uses audio.
    It served as an XMBC/Nvidia media box before that. Can't say I had any issues with audio latency - not as good as the SoundStorm (3ms ASIO latency!) but not awful either.

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    130

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sirdilznik View Post
    Who in their right mind would ever buy a discrete video card from VIA (or S3 for that matter) regardless of their OS choice? I understand some people might get stuck with an onboard chipset and have to make do, but to actually consciously decide to buy a discrete card from VIA just boggles my mind. I don't even care what the price may be when there are discrete cards from both AMD and nVidia in the $50 range that are at least as powerful and certainly far better supported.
    How does power consumption of VIA cards compare to NVIDIA/ATI?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •