Page 4 of 12 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 117

Thread: The Open-Source ATI Driver Is Becoming A Lot Faster

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    69

    Default

    I have R370 in my laptop. So really would like to see benchmarks on older hardware.

    PS. Was a vsync disabled in catalyst driver in this benchmark? I do not see this information in article. Without vsync disabled it is essentially cheating on mesa side.

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Russe, Bulgaria
    Posts
    507

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by elanthis View Post
    Threading and locking h....
    Very interesting read indeed. I think this MESA multi-threading topic needs more talking and less coding for now. Just to clear things out.

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    147

    Default

    Do the Catalyst drivers support "swap buffers wait" ?
    If yes then we shouldn't be comparing against Gallium with "No SBW".
    apples to apples

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    75

    Default

    @elanthis: As an amateur myself I really look forward to a guide/article about that matter as most of the courses I've taken only take up pipelining or that mindset of threading things. But in most cases they don't teach threading at all!
    I've also saved the post for future reading

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    99

    Default What Absolute Rubbish

    The benchmarks clearly show all the open source drivers are substantially slower than the proprietary ones, apart from a couple of corner cases.

    To say otherwise is dishonest tomfoolery.

    When is everyone going to wake up and realise that the radeon devs are jerking everyone off ?

    To some, this will come over as trollery. To some it will come over as a stuck record.

    Well if the devs actually did what they promised, there could be no complaints. But all we get here is the same tired CRAP time after time: the devs are part-time, the proprietary driver has more resources, blah fscking blah.

    A CHILD could do a better job than the buffoons currently driving the development work in the open source ATI arena.

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    155

    Default

    A CHILD could do a better job than the buffoons currently driving the development work in the open source ATI arena.
    Please do it, then.
    You seem so well suited for the task.

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Skopje, MK
    Posts
    48

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gordboy View Post
    The benchmarks clearly show all the open source drivers are substantially slower than the proprietary ones, apart from a couple of corner cases.

    To say otherwise is dishonest tomfoolery.

    When is everyone going to wake up and realise that the radeon devs are jerking everyone off ?

    To some, this will come over as trollery. To some it will come over as a stuck record.

    Well if the devs actually did what they promised, there could be no complaints. But all we get here is the same tired CRAP time after time: the devs are part-time, the proprietary driver has more resources, blah fscking blah.

    A CHILD could do a better job than the buffoons currently driving the development work in the open source ATI arena.
    Nobody said that FOSS drivers are faster than the blobs. But to say that the FOSS devs don't do a good job making radeon good, is a very foolish and ignorant statement. There's clearly an improvement, and it's definitely better than nuoveau. People like you are the reason we can't have nice things!

    We should all be thankful that we can watch videos without tearing and play some games on Linux.

  8. #38
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    6,613

    Default

    The oss drivers are not that bad, just for lowend chips the performance it not even enough to use google earth smoothly - fglrx was much faster there. A google earth benchmark would be interesting. xv usually works and kde/compiz desktops effects but more...? Desktop users just replace the card for games but what should laptop users do? Use older os with fglrx or buy a new laptop?

  9. #39
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    222

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gordboy View Post
    The benchmarks clearly show all the open source drivers are substantially slower than the proprietary ones, apart from a couple of corner cases.

    To say otherwise is dishonest tomfoolery.

    When is everyone going to wake up and realise that the radeon devs are jerking everyone off ?

    To some, this will come over as trollery. To some it will come over as a stuck record.

    Well if the devs actually did what they promised, there could be no complaints. But all we get here is the same tired CRAP time after time: the devs are part-time, the proprietary driver has more resources, blah fscking blah.

    A CHILD could do a better job than the buffoons currently driving the development work in the open source ATI arena.
    You're trolling, right? Please tell me you are.

  10. #40
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    621

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gordboy View Post
    The benchmarks clearly show all the open source drivers are substantially slower than the proprietary ones, apart from a couple of corner cases.

    To say otherwise is dishonest tomfoolery.

    When is everyone going to wake up and realise that the radeon devs are jerking everyone off ?

    To some, this will come over as trollery. To some it will come over as a stuck record.

    Well if the devs actually did what they promised, there could be no complaints. But all we get here is the same tired CRAP time after time: the devs are part-time, the proprietary driver has more resources, blah fscking blah.

    A CHILD could do a better job than the buffoons currently driving the development work in the open source ATI arena.
    You got what you paid for. Enjoy.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •