Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 24 of 24

Thread: NVIDIA OpenCL Linux Benchmarks

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    6,622

    Default

    Why does PTS not install the headers locally?

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    492

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by deanjo View Post
    Hehe, that's a CC 1.3 feature and GT220 only supports CC 1.2.

    In short, I was wrong, there were some changes with regard to CC since the 8000 thousand series. But my point was there's a mistake (two actually) in the article. It claims that the GT220 is faster than 9800GTX (48 vs 128 CUDA cores, who are we kidding here?) and also that we should expect it to be faster.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Third Rock from the Sun
    Posts
    6,583

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bug77 View Post
    Hehe, that's a CC 1.3 feature and GT220 only supports CC 1.2.

    In short, I was wrong, there were some changes with regard to CC since the 8000 thousand series. But my point was there's a mistake (two actually) in the article. It claims that the GT220 is faster than 9800GTX (48 vs 128 CUDA cores, who are we kidding here?) and also that we should expect it to be faster.
    Understandable, when I was thinking of "200 series" I was thinking of the GTX line. Anyways I noticed that my previous bench of the GTX-580 was running the wrong mandel test. Here are the complete results again with the correct test included.


  4. #24

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dyna View Post
    You mean something like this? As described on the last page...
    I did not. Michael failed to describe an architectural change that made that possible. For all I know, the performance discrepancy is a bug.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •