Page 5 of 6 FirstFirst ... 3456 LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 52

Thread: Which is better for 3d acceleration

  1. #41
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    6

    Default

    Im not too bothered about multi display.

    Just interested in being able to run photography progs, games and films without problems.

    Sounds like Intel's sandy bridge might be an interesting thing to keep an eye on, if Intel graphics support has typically been good. Ive only ever used very low powered intel solutions.

    At the moment im on a AMD Phemon II with an ATI 5750. I was considering selling the 5750 to get an Nvidia equivelent, hence this thread.

    As said earlier. Ill see what the next ATI driver brings.

    But it seems some people are suggesting out of the box with minimal fiddling Nvidia will be better for my needs.

  2. #42
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    145

    Default

    I would love to go pure AMD for my next workstation (if only they'd know I'd buy it because of their open source strategy, and give more resources to this department..). Problem is, I will use the machine primarily for 3D and graphics creation, and I also really want to play OilRush I am also a Gentoo user so I'd like to be free in my choice of kernel and Xorg version.

    As I see it, the only choice is nVidia, and it's not bad. Of course I'd like to have KMS and xrandr, but the performance and stability of the nVidia blob is really good (granted I have only used it up to GF8800 series, and i've read some people having performance problems in Blender with the drivers for GF4xx). I can't comment on the ATi/AMD blob as I've never used it, but I don't like what I read/hear and don't want to take the chance, yet. I'm interested though to see if AMD's new driver will be the "magical" one...

    Maybe in 4-5 years time when I will upgrade again, the open source Radeon driver will have good performance and features to be useful in digital content creation, and highend games, and I will be able to buy a gfx-card from AMD, all running pure FLOSS goodness - except for the native commercial games

  3. #43
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    3,046

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by deanjo View Post
    No, I was responding to a trolls post.
    Actually, he had a point and wasn't trolling (as MY earlier commentary alluded to...)- if he was trolling...so're you. (Which we both know you weren't on the NVidia reccomendation...)

  4. #44
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    3,046

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Conqueror View Post
    But it seems some people are suggesting out of the box with minimal fiddling Nvidia will be better for my needs.
    Depends on the parts (On a laptop, you will NOT want NVidia Optimus parts at all...you're better off with AMD's stuff at that point- at least it will work...), but yeah, that's the current story.

  5. #45
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Third Rock from the Sun
    Posts
    6,583

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Svartalf View Post
    Depends on the parts (On a laptop, you will NOT want NVidia Optimus parts at all...you're better off with AMD's stuff at that point- at least it will work...), but yeah, that's the current story.
    It depends on the model of laptop that carries the optimus parts Svartalf. Some you can select the nvidia GPU in the BIOS and it works. Others venders can't be bothered to give the option in the BIOS.

  6. #46
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Third Rock from the Sun
    Posts
    6,583

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Svartalf View Post
    Actually, he had a point and wasn't trolling (as MY earlier commentary alluded to...)- if he was trolling...so're you. (Which we both know you weren't on the NVidia reccomendation...)
    What truthful point was that? The opensource drivers are no less buggy (in fact the opposite) and they do not give the best performance.

  7. #47
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    459

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by deanjo View Post
    It depends on the model of laptop that carries the optimus parts Svartalf. Some you can select the nvidia GPU in the BIOS and it works. Others venders can't be bothered to give the option in the BIOS.

    just to be clear here, these so called Hybrid Gfx chip set's as in two or more separate Gfx parts included so you can select between graphics performance or sustained battery life, are a real pain right now in several OSS OS's ,remember there's more than just Linux here, there are a lot of them around today

    if your device/laptop does not include the ability in it's equivalent of BIOS to manually switch between them , dont buy it is my advice and inform the vendor why, so they can perhaps add that option in a newer update...

  8. #48
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Germany Nortrhine-Westfalia
    Posts
    1

    Default thanks...

    thanks, that helped me a lot!
    regards,
    chantal

  9. #49
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    1,946

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Conqueror View Post
    But it seems some people are suggesting out of the box with minimal fiddling Nvidia will be better for my needs.
    NVidia have much broader software and hardware support, both legacy and faster for upcoming(although this changes). They also support video decoding(huge +), but bad at multimonitor cfgs. And obviously wine runs better(but this changes too).

    But if they say no(optimus case), or you are not happy with kernel/glibc/xorg software version they choose - they do not care. And in case you want opensource driver, its hardly usable.

    AMD has everything mirrored. Proprietary hangs a bit past nvidia in release dates, supports way less legacy cards, has no video decode(and will never have), but good at multimonitor cfgs. I didn't try lastest 11.1 so I cannot tell anything on stability, but 9.5 was slap in the face - crashing xorg straight when switching tty's.

    The opensource driver where most cards have to land after few years due to support drop is subset of proprietary, but its still ways better than (not-)nvidia's noveau. Its 3D performance & features are still on par with year 2004(with a lot of features missing, some due to patent traps which AMD fights(kinda)), but the drivers will never outdate anymore.

  10. #50
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    1,946

    Default

    And AMD has John Bridgeman, who is very good, patient, informative professional; but in way too small team with a driver featuring much more bugs(but decreasing) than nvidia.

    ... and Nvidia has blobs for *BSD and Solaris.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •