Page 29 of 41 FirstFirst ... 19272829303139 ... LastLast
Results 281 to 290 of 408

Thread: AMD's opensource lies exposed

  1. #281
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    142

    Default

    'waaaah - waaah - waaah - my driver isnt as good as it could be'
    stop whining, get the specs amd released and get coding rather than bitching on a forum
    It's not my driver, its your driver. My problem is bad hardware support gets in my way as a developer, hinders software companies' efforts to port software to gnu/linux environment.

  2. #282
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    357

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by glxextxexlg View Post
    It's not my driver, its your driver. My problem is bad hardware support gets in my way as a developer, hinders software companies' efforts to port software to gnu/linux environment.
    Correction - its a PUBLIC driver, if you don't have the hardware I can only ask you again why comment on a forum for the hardware/software? It is you that has the problem I have my reservations about the status quo which is not ideal but nothing to do with this accusation of deceit - we are where we are and it is up to US as the community to make things better.

  3. #283
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    2,927

    Default

    The GNU/Linux environment does not support OpenGL3.

    That is the problem and this is what the open driver developers (including AMD and Intel people) are currently addressing.

    Binary blobs are not a part of the GNU/Linux environment, they are a kludgy add-on. They are like Crossover Wine for running Internet Explorer, or the ndiswrapper for running Windows drivers. A temporary duct-tape fix for a serious problem: there is no Free and Open Source solution for OpenGL 3, or for programming modern GPU hardware.

    Any real fan of GNU/Linux should be interested in fixing this deficiency instead of calling for even more dependence on Linux-hostile hardware manufacturers.

  4. #284
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    357

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pingufunkybeat View Post
    The GNU/Linux environment does not support OpenGL3.

    That is the problem and this is what the open driver developers (including AMD and Intel people) are currently addressing.

    Binary blobs are not a part of the GNU/Linux environment, they are a kludgy add-on. They are like Crossover Wine for running Internet Explorer, or the ndiswrapper for running Windows drivers. A temporary duct-tape fix for a serious problem: there is no Free and Open Source solution for OpenGL 3, or for programming modern GPU hardware.

    Any real fan of GNU/Linux should be interested in fixing this deficiency instead of calling for even more dependence on Linux-hostile hardware manufacturers.
    This is an issue for the khronos group rather than mesa - they are the group which is comprised of amd/ati , nvidia and many others - we must bear in mind that mesa is not openGL at the end of the day and if the openGL standard has licensing issues then it cannot really be called open - like i said ( but nobody read ) open sourced and free are not the same!

  5. #285
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    142

    Default

    Linux-hostile hardware manufacturers.
    http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?pag..._results&num=1

    If nvidia is hostile towards linux they wouldn't be releasing good binary drivers for it and like it or not, majority of the linux users use their hardware and drivers. Looking at the figures of all gpu sales worldwide, their choice should be intel, because intel sells more IGPs than any other gpu manufacturer (%50 or so of all gpus) and their drivers are fully open source (but are they good enough is the most important part).

    And if there's a hostile-towards-linux company it is amd. They release bad binary drivers with bad kernel xserver support. And they release specs and do nearly nothing to develop a driver out of them. And they eventually binary driver support to their hardware, which sucks in the first place.

  6. #286
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    912

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by glxextxexlg View Post
    http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?pag..._results&num=1

    If nvidia is hostile towards linux they wouldn't be releasing good binary drivers for it and like it or not, majority of the linux users use their hardware and drivers. Looking at the figures of all gpu sales worldwide, their choice should be intel, because intel sells more IGPs than any other gpu manufacturer (%50 or so of all gpus) and their drivers are fully open source (but are they good enough is the most important part).

    And if there's a hostile-towards-linux company it is amd. They release bad binary drivers with bad kernel xserver support. And they release specs and do nearly nothing to develop a driver out of them. And they eventually binary driver support to their hardware, which sucks in the first place.
    Sorry, but that's all bullshit. AMD are most certainly not hostile towards linux. And you're just being an idiotic troll with that comment.

  7. #287
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    357

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by glxextxexlg View Post
    http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?pag..._results&num=1

    If nvidia is hostile towards linux they wouldn't be releasing good binary drivers for it and like it or not, majority of the linux users use their hardware and drivers. Looking at the figures of all gpu sales worldwide, their choice should be intel, because intel sells more IGPs than any other gpu manufacturer (%50 or so of all gpus) and their drivers are fully open source (but are they good enough is the most important part).

    And if there's a hostile-towards-linux company it is amd. They release bad binary drivers with bad kernel xserver support. And they release specs and do nearly nothing to develop a driver out of them. And they eventually binary driver support to their hardware, which sucks in the first place.
    FGLRX is not bad at all , its slightly behind nvidia thats true but not by a million miles. Where AMD have excelled is releasing specs for their GPUs. AMD should not be developing the free driver - that is the whole point of releasing the specs - it gives the community ( ie: me and you ) the opportunity to support ourselves rather than relying on the FGLRX devs. Like I said some people commenting on this thread do not understand!

  8. #288
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    357

    Default

    I repeat linux is not an operating system - it is a GPL kernel as is hurd

  9. #289
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    5,411

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by darkbasic View Post
    Come on M$, we want the best Windows 8 ever, we need a clean forum
    Windows8 need:

    1.)"Windows_PowerShell#PowerShell_2.0" ULTRA BASH emulator

    2.)Drop NTFS and Got WINFS Btree Filesystem to emulate an BTRFS linux filesystem.

    3.)Packetmanage system or some people call it ''Appstore'' with an similar system to .deb or .rpm to emulate the ultimate linux feeling.

    3.) Full openGL5 and openCL2 and direktX 13 support with ultra Visualstudio GCC emulator Compiler.

    4.)windows mobil8 to emulate an andorid and KDE5 for windows to emulate the ultimate linux feeling.

    5.) emulate an out of the box radeon feeling by integrating the catalyst into the windows-kernel.

    6.)Integrating an virus scanner and XP-anti-spy software into the window kernel for emulating the security of linux.

    7.) Integrate an similar technic like WINE and Dosbox into this technic to get old windows and dos software to run.

    8.) an VM for porno surfing to get the security in porno surfing like linux or start every app into an sandbox like sandboxy to emulate the linux root free desktop usage and emulate the multiuser fuctionality by Virtual maschines.

    and so one and so one microsoft really need to do a hart work.

  10. #290
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    101

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Qaridarium View Post
    Windows8 need:

    1.)"Windows_PowerShell#PowerShell_2.0" ULTRA BASH emulator

    2.)Drop NTFS and Got WINFS Btree Filesystem to emulate an BTRFS linux filesystem.

    3.)Packetmanage system or some people call it ''Appstore'' with an similar system to .deb or .rpm to emulate the ultimate linux feeling.

    3.) Full openGL5 and openCL2 and direktX 13 support with ultra Visualstudio GCC emulator Compiler.

    4.)windows mobil8 to emulate an andorid and KDE5 for windows to emulate the ultimate linux feeling.

    5.) emulate an out of the box radeon feeling by integrating the catalyst into the windows-kernel.

    6.)Integrating an virus scanner and XP-anti-spy software into the window kernel for emulating the security of linux.

    7.) Integrate an similar technic like WINE and Dosbox into this technic to get old windows and dos software to run.

    8.) an VM for porno surfing to get the security in porno surfing like linux or start every app into an sandbox like sandboxy to emulate the linux root free desktop usage and emulate the multiuser fuctionality by Virtual maschines.

    and so one and so one microsoft really need to do a hart work.

    Or you know.. Just turn Windows into a Linux Distro.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •