Page 28 of 33 FirstFirst ... 182627282930 ... LastLast
Results 271 to 280 of 326

Thread: What Was Your First Linux Distribution?

  1. #271
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    2

    Default ZipSlack circa 1996

    That quirky offshoot of Slackware that was designed to be operated entirely from a 100MB Zip disk. At the time, 1997, we were still using the 2.0 kernel. You could boot the kernel from DOS using LOADLIN. Good times...

  2. #272
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    1

    Default

    Mandrake , it was 2002.. nowdays archlinux

  3. #273

    Default First Distribution

    Ubuntu 5.04

  4. #274
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    1

    Default I'm really old ... SLS Linux

    I started off with the Soft Landing System, SLS Linux, way back in the 1991/1992 schoolyear sometime at University. I can't remember what version it was, but the kernel was down in the 0.7 version range. I gave it a whopping 5mb partition out of my 20mb RLL HD in my home built AMD 386-SX that had 4mb of RAM, a Trident VGA card, and a 1024x768 page white monitor with the worst refresh rates in the world. I sweated bricks after working out all of the X server timings by hand, and then praying I didn't blow up my monitor in the process. My Internet connection was a 1200 baud Atari modem, that I managed to run term through on the schools old Decstation's running Ultrix.

    I went with Linux because my crappy PC didn't meet the 386BSD requirements.

    Somehow I really miss that old box....

  5. #275
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    1

    Default Way back in 1993

    It was just before kernel 1.0 ... slackware in it's early incarnations. It took hold immediately and within a year our group was running it as the core server, and linux desktops were proliferating.

    From the unofficial history of slackware at http://slackdown.co.uk/history.html
    1993-08-04 1.01 0.99pl12A With: ksh, tcl, XFree86 1.3; Download from: ftp.cdrom.com.

    My first case of unfaithfulness was with Ubuntu 5.04 in 2005 which has lasted till now ... and am about to be unfaithful again and switch to Linux Mint. I still have a soft spot for slackware.

  6. #276
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    20

    Default SLS

    Not SLES, but SLS (soft landing systems) in 1993. Back when men were men, and first thing after installing linux was to spend 2 weeks downloading stuff and fixing stuff.
    Then this cool new distro called slackware came out and I switched. Made installation a snap. But you still had to know what you were doing - if you wanted sound with your doom, you had to recompile the kernel, telling it your soundblaster DMA channel, I/O ports and memory addresses. Then came redhat, then fedora. After that it was SuSE professional, then SLES and opensuse, then ubuntu and debian, and centos. What a long strange trip it's been.

  7. #277
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    20

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bantolph View Post
    I started off with the Soft Landing System, SLS Linux, way back in the 1991/1992 schoolyear sometime at University. I can't remember what version it was, but the kernel was down in the 0.7 version range. I gave it a whopping 5mb partition out of my 20mb RLL HD in my home built AMD 386-SX that had 4mb of RAM, a Trident VGA card, and a 1024x768 page white monitor with the worst refresh rates in the world. I sweated bricks after working out all of the X server timings by hand, and then praying I didn't blow up my monitor in the process. My Internet connection was a 1200 baud Atari modem, that I managed to run term through on the schools old Decstation's running Ultrix.
    Ah yes, how could I forget how much fun it was to set up X11? Put on a pot of coffee, sit down with the monitor specs, and calculate the modelines. Those were the days!

  8. #278
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    33

    Default

    Linspire right after they got sued and changed their name from Lindows around 2005.

    Linspire was based in Debian, and it looked nice enough, but it was a for profit company and I don't think they were returning anything back to the Linux community before they started Freespire. I think I had to buy the disks off the shelf at OfficeMax, since my internet connection wasn't working well. I didn't feel like purchasing the kernel source through Linspire so that I could compile VMWare, so I changed it over to use Debian sources instead and had to make a few symlinks. I thought patching Linspire to use Debian was cool at the time, but I was at least a couple of years behind other people doing the same. I also tried Suse, but I had as many problems as with Linspire getting things to work, and it wasn't supported as well as Debian. I don't miss those days of trying to get everything to work --using the integrated Intel graphics until I could buy an nVidia card because ATI wasn't supported, and buying a dedicated sound card because the integrated sound card wasn't supported, etc.

    And yes, Walmart once sold computers with Linspire, but I built my first from CompUSA parts the first time I had enough money.

  9. #279
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    1

    Default

    Slackware 2.2
    From floppy disk images downloaded via 28.8k modem. Ah the good old days..

  10. #280
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    101

    Default Corel Linux 1.0

    Another Corel Linux 1.0 user. I didn't have the internet those days so I was pretty much limited to what was on the cd. That lasted maybe a couple months then I went back to Windows for several years. Around 2005 I went to Debian (with the Internet this time).

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •