Thanks for the tip, a bit of googleing also gave me http://xorg.freedesktop.org/wiki/RadeonProgram which also added some confiance.
I'll probably be getting an ATI graphics card for me new Linux box then (never thought I'd say that one day)
The only real problem of R600g/c is the lack of S3TC. It will take a while before it will be solved.
Thanks for the tip, a bit of googleing also gave me http://xorg.freedesktop.org/wiki/RadeonProgram which also added some confiance.
I'll probably be getting an ATI graphics card for me new Linux box then (never thought I'd say that one day)
WoW does not work on r600g, and I'm guessing SC2 doesn't either.
If you run WoW in OpenGL mode on r600g, it will look like the textures are stitched together oddly and it will crash within a minute of getting into the game.
DirectX mode doesn't crash, but it has a lot more rendering errors to the point where it's not playable.
I think r600c ran WoW in DirectX mode fairly well at one point. It crashed like once every 30 minutes IIRC. I'll have to try it out again. OpenGL mode on r600c was the same situation as on r600g.
The closed source fglrx driver does run WoW pretty well. So I guess you can't go wrong buying an AMD card.
SC2 is certified platinum on the RadeonProgram matrix. I haven't tried it myself.
Why is it odd? It's a different engine or a differing version of the same engine using differing features. Just because it's from the same company doesn't mean that they're going to use the same problematic code everywhere unless it's exactly the same engine (Heh... KoTOR and KoTOR II's a good example of this... Quite a few mis-uses of the OpenGL API there... >:-D)
you really should upgrade your notebook to an newer one get an amd fusion one much better and cheap.
r100 will not get any big step improvements the lowest card you should get is an r300
r300-500 get the lastest opensource work in 2.6.38 kernel and mesa and so one.
r600-r900 is also fine.
r100 is really out of support range.