Page 3 of 12 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 117

Thread: How Old ATI GPUs Can Be Faster On Open Drivers

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    31

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pingufunkybeat View Post
    This is wrong. I switched from Nvidia to AMD because of OSS drivers, as did many other people.
    I was on ATI in my Windows days, but I have stayed with it in subsequent hardware purchases because of the OSS drivers.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    3,788

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MostAwesomeDude View Post
    Stop talking about S3TC. We already have done as much as we can.
    Does that mean no libtxc_dxtn support for r600g? That would be sad.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    5,411

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RealNC View Post
    Does that mean no libtxc_dxtn support for r600g? That would be sad.
    no thats mean they make the architectur ready for s3tc but they can't add the suport.

    they just wait for free devs in free lands to write that support in an external lib.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    3,788

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Qaridarium View Post
    no thats mean they make the architectur ready for s3tc but they can't add the suport.

    they just wait for free devs in free lands to write that support in an external lib.
    libtxc_dxtn *is* the external lib. r600c uses it. If you install libtxc_dxtn, you get S3TC support when using r600c.

    But r600g does not support libtxc_dxtn.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    20

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pingufunkybeat View Post
    This is wrong. I switched from Nvidia to AMD because of OSS drivers, as did many other people.
    Sure, every generalization has its exceptions, and I thought about mentioning this one specifically given the audience but decided not to. Some people switched to AMD to promote an open-source ideology, but imo they rewarded the company too early. AMD gives docs, which are helpful, but they don't really support open-source stuff, it's nearly always broken or way behind, and their proprietary driver is too, so that leaves most AMD/ATI users in a bad spot. They dumped docs in desperation during hard times hoping to buy loyalty from open-source purists without dedicating many resources to the thing or really supporting the OSS ecosystem, and I don't think that's the right behavior to encourage or reward. We want real support or real help, not lip service.

    While there are some purists that support AMD for its decision to release docs, my experience has been that most Linux users still push nvidia all day long for practical use, because nvidia keeps their driver in a working state and is consistently adding new, useful features and fixes. AMD's proprietary driver, which is supposedly their supported Linux product, is generally broken for several months out of the year as we await compatibility fixes for the new X server, and we don't even need to mention the instability or lacking featuresets for that to be marked an instant fail by AMD. There are the open drivers, but the open drivers have much worse performance and many fewer advanced features in general (though they also generally have some nice other features that the proprietary drivers lack, like KMS, the featureset is not geared toward utilizing a discrete GPU to its ability).

    This has never happened to me on nvidia; as soon as a new X is stable, there is at least a public beta release, usually shortly thereafter turned stable if not stable previously, that supports the new server. nouveau may be a harder slodge than ati due to lack of docs, but at least there is well-supported and useful alternative.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    France
    Posts
    189

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MostAwesomeDude View Post
    Nobody pays the community developers to write code that makes GPUs more efficient.
    Where is the "Donate" button ?

    Quote Originally Posted by Qaridarium View Post
    they just wait for free devs in free lands to write that support in an external lib.
    Where are they ? Where is the "Donate" button ?
    Because, in my case (I don't know if I representative of free AMD driver usage), r600 is useless without S3TC.

    Quote Originally Posted by RealNC View Post
    If you install libtxc_dxtn, you get S3TC support when using r600c.
    No. R600c/g (both) doesn't support libtxc_dxtn.
    http://www.x.org/wiki/RadeonFeature

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    3,788

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by whitecat View Post
    No. R600c/g (both) doesn't support libtxc_dxtn.
    http://www.x.org/wiki/RadeonFeature
    But r300c/g does.

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    120

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 89c51 View Post
    openhardware doesn't matter that much (at least for the end user)

    What would seem like a "feasible" thing to do is, for a manufacturer, to move its driver development to G3D on all operating systems (it is portable afaik). But i don't thing none of the big 3 (nv, ati, intel) are going to do it (or can ) .

    I agree, but what I say is that as Open Software pushes propietary OSs, a good openhardware would push the big 3

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    87

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RealNC View Post
    But r300c/g does.
    See this bugreport on FDO:
    https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32888

    If you want you can play around with R600_ENABLE_S3TC. As I describe you might be lucky and it works for the texture base levels (my tests were on a mobile R600 chip).
    If you're not so lucky (I also did the tests on a R700 card) then you might trigger GPU resets. I presume some alignment is still wrong, which probably also depends on whether we're dealing with R600 or R700 architecture. Alex also told me that some formats need tiling, not sure if that's the case here. Still reading the docs

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Russe, Bulgaria
    Posts
    505

    Default

    LiquidAcid, dude. Is it described how to upload compressed textures on GPU in R600+ docs from AMD?

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •