Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 23 of 23

Thread: CompilerDeathMatch 64bit Final results

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Ghent
    Posts
    219

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by staalmannen View Post
    As we speak, I am running the KenCC (Plan9 C compiler, ancestor of the Golang compiler) for the pts/compilation suite
    CC=/opt/plan9/bin/pcc CXX=$CC (to avoid another c++ compiler to give results, looking at cfront to get results here... but I have not found a wrapper like fort77 for cfront)
    F77=fort77
    These are the results for this initial thing
    http://openbenchmarking.org/result/1...IV-KENCCCOMP87

    Really surprised about getting a result from kernel compilation, and I doubt that it actually is a functional kernel. I need to check a few more things before being sure.

    I will do the "compiler" suite too for KenCC and then move on to Open Watcom, ACK (if I can make the build work) etc...

    some AUR links for people interested:

    AUcc
    http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26083
    OpenWatcom
    http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26963
    https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47685 (fortran)
    FTEQCC (???)
    http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29946
    nwcc
    http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=23648
    Tendra
    http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18467
    KenCC
    https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47543
    ACK
    https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47568

    to-be-packaged:
    LCC
    http://sites.google.com/site/lccreta...iler/downloads

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    338

    Default

    I don't really understand you: what compilers did you use in the end? Why would you need a fortran wrapper to compile mplayer and the kernel?

    My idea was to get a big fortran code and compile it with gfortran and co. Am I missing something?

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Ghent
    Posts
    219

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by HokTar View Post
    I don't really understand you: what compilers did you use in the end? Why would you need a fortran wrapper to compile mplayer and the kernel?

    My idea was to get a big fortran code and compile it with gfortran and co. Am I missing something?
    No the only reason Fortran was discussed was because when PTS got upgraded, the compiler suite benchmarks required not only a C compiler but also a Fortran compiler.
    To make "fair" comparison between compilers that do compile fortran (like GCC, open64) and those that do not, those that do not get the fort77 wrapper.

    For mplayer and the kernel, that should not have any influence.
    Unfortunately all these odd compilers fail the vast majority of the tests. I have not had time to play much with it lately though. The stuff is out there however so if someone wants to have a go at it, it is there

    I would especially be interested to know if someone is able to run PTS tests on openwatcom. This is a weird piece of compiler that I do not really know how to use properly

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •