Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 41

Thread: Wayland Is Now Playing Well With NVIDIA, ATI Drivers

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    14,780

    Default Wayland Is Now Playing Well With NVIDIA, ATI Drivers

    Phoronix: Wayland Is Now Playing Well With NVIDIA, ATI Drivers

    For those of you interested in running the Wayland Display Server on your NVIDIA and ATI graphics cards, without running it nestled inside an X Server, it should work if you use the newest Linux kernel code...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=OTExMw

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    147

    Default

    I am really looking forward to using Wayland on, my favorite, Ubuntu ASAP. I hope Canonical won't postpone it for after the next LTS. I want 12.04 with Unity + Wayland!

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    147

    Default

    This is a bit off-topic but given Wayland and PulseAudio, does anybody else see Linux video/audio moving in opposite directions? Wayland is dropping network transparency for a lean n' mean graphics framework while PulseAudio stacks a network server on top of ALSA.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    912

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by zoomblab View Post
    This is a bit off-topic but given Wayland and PulseAudio, does anybody else see Linux video/audio moving in opposite directions? Wayland is dropping network transparency for a lean n' mean graphics framework while PulseAudio stacks a network server on top of ALSA.
    Then don't use pulseaudio.
    With this news though, I may just get motivation to properly setup switching between fglrx & r600g to start trying some of these things (i.e Wayland) out.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    989

    Default

    aw, you had me going... from the article title i thought you meant that the binary drivers were playing well with wayland :P

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    1,676

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by zoomblab View Post
    This is a bit off-topic but given Wayland and PulseAudio, does anybody else see Linux video/audio moving in opposite directions? Wayland is dropping network transparency for a lean n' mean graphics framework while PulseAudio stacks a network server on top of ALSA.
    In wayland you will be able to do the same things you do with X but in a different way.

    Its just that the functionality hasn't been added yet. Sadly only Kristian is working actively on it.

    As for Pulseaudio the only thing that should be done is to be integrated in a single project with Jack in order to have only ONE server handling desktop and pro audio.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    48

    Default

    If someone can piece together all the required pieces, it would be cool if they could produce a live CD for would-be testers...

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    1,676

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Otus View Post
    If someone can piece together all the required pieces, it would be cool if they could produce a live CD for would-be testers...
    It is not ready yet. There are a lot of things to be done on the wayland side and also window managers must be ported. But before WM get ported the infrastructure must be there which is not the case yet.

    If you want to try it i thing there are a few scripts/instructions floating around for various distros.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    147

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 89c51 View Post
    In wayland you will be able to do the same things you do with X but in a different way.
    Did you read what I said? I was talking about architecture. Plain Wayland drops the network transparency stuff from the core framework. Of course you will be able to optionally put an X server on top of it.

    http://wayland.freedesktop.org/architecture.html

    PulseAudio on the other side is designed as a server architecture much like X does. No?

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    99

    Default

    So what advantages does Wayland provide for the end user?
    Is it really faster than X?

    Or the only advantages come in the form of easier development (due to less code bloat)?

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •